Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Process-Centric Analysis of Agentic Software Systems

Shuyang Liu, Yang Chen, Rahul Krishna, Saurabh Sinha, Jatin Ganhotra, Reyhan Jabbarvand · Dec 2, 2025 · Citations: 0

Data freshness

Extraction: Fresh

Check recency before relying on this page for active eval decisions. Use stale pages as context and verify against current hub results.

Metadata refreshed

Mar 7, 2026, 4:30 PM

Stale

Extraction refreshed

Apr 10, 2026, 7:17 AM

Fresh

Extraction source

Persisted extraction

Confidence 0.25

Abstract

Agentic systems are modern software systems: they consist of orchestrated modules, expose interfaces, and are deployed in software pipelines. Unlike conventional programs, their execution, i.e., trajectories, is inherently stochastic and adaptive to the problems they solve. Evaluation of such systems is often outcome-centric. This narrow focus overlooks detailed insights, failing to explain how agents reason, plan, act, or change their strategies. Inspired by the structured representation of conventional software systems as graphs, we introduce Graphectory to systematically encode the temporal and semantic relations in such systems. Using Graphectory, we automatically analyze 4000 trajectories of two dominant agentic programming workflows, SWE-agent and OpenHands, with four backbone Large Language Models (LLMs), attempting to resolve SWE-bench issues. Our automated analyses (completed within four minutes) reveal that: (1) agents using richer prompts or stronger LLMs exhibit more complex Graphectory, reflecting deeper exploration, broader context gathering, and more thorough validation; (2) agents' strategies vary with problem difficulty and the underlying LLM - for resolved issues, strategies often follow coherent localization-patching-validation steps, while unresolved ones exhibit chaotic or backtracking behaviors; and (3) even successful agentic systems often display inefficient processes. We also implement a novel technique for real-time construction and analysis of Graphectory and Langutory during agent execution to flag trajectory issues. Upon detecting such issues, the technique notifies the agent with a diagnostic message and, when applicable, rolls back the trajectory. Experiments show that online monitoring and interventions improve resolution rates by 6.9%-23.5% across models for problematic instances, while significantly shortening trajectories with near-zero overhead.

Low-signal caution for protocol decisions

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • Extraction flags indicate low-signal or possible false-positive protocol mapping.
  • Extraction confidence is 0.25 (below strong-reference threshold).

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

Main weakness

Extraction flags indicate low-signal or possible false-positive protocol mapping.

Trust level

Low

Eval-Fit Score

0/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Detected

HFEPX Fit

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence: Low

Field Provenance & Confidence

Each key protocol field shows extraction state, confidence band, and data source so you can decide whether to trust it directly or validate from full text.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction missing

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

Evidence snippet: Agentic systems are modern software systems: they consist of orchestrated modules, expose interfaces, and are deployed in software pipelines.

Evaluation Modes

missing

None explicit

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction missing

Validate eval design from full paper text.

Evidence snippet: Agentic systems are modern software systems: they consist of orchestrated modules, expose interfaces, and are deployed in software pipelines.

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction missing

No explicit QC controls found.

Evidence snippet: Agentic systems are modern software systems: they consist of orchestrated modules, expose interfaces, and are deployed in software pipelines.

Benchmarks / Datasets

partial

SWE Bench

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction evidenced

Useful for quick benchmark comparison.

Evidence snippet: Using Graphectory, we automatically analyze 4000 trajectories of two dominant agentic programming workflows, SWE-agent and OpenHands, with four backbone Large Language Models (LLMs), attempting to resolve SWE-bench issues.

Reported Metrics

missing

Not extracted

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction missing

No metric anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: Agentic systems are modern software systems: they consist of orchestrated modules, expose interfaces, and are deployed in software pipelines.

Rater Population

missing

Unknown

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction missing

Rater source not explicitly reported.

Evidence snippet: Agentic systems are modern software systems: they consist of orchestrated modules, expose interfaces, and are deployed in software pipelines.

Human Data Lens

  • Uses human feedback: No
  • Feedback types: None
  • Rater population: Unknown
  • Unit of annotation: Trajectory
  • Expertise required: Coding
  • Extraction source: Persisted extraction

Evaluation Lens

  • Evaluation modes:
  • Agentic eval: Long Horizon
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Confidence: 0.25
  • Flags: low_signal, possible_false_positive

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

SWE-bench

Reported Metrics

No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.

Research Brief

Deterministic synthesis

Agentic systems are modern software systems: they consist of orchestrated modules, expose interfaces, and are deployed in software pipelines. HFEPX signals include Long Horizon with confidence 0.25. Updated from current HFEPX corpus.

Generated Apr 10, 2026, 7:17 AM · Grounded in abstract + metadata only

Key Takeaways

  • Agentic systems are modern software systems: they consist of orchestrated modules, expose interfaces, and are deployed in software pipelines.
  • Evaluation of such systems is often outcome-centric.

Researcher Actions

  • Treat this as method context, then pivot to protocol-specific HFEPX hubs.
  • Cross-check benchmark overlap: SWE-bench.
  • Verify metric definitions before comparing against your eval pipeline.

Caveats

  • Generated from title, abstract, and extracted metadata only; full-paper implementation details are not parsed.
  • Low-signal flag detected: protocol relevance may be indirect.

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • Agentic systems are modern software systems: they consist of orchestrated modules, expose interfaces, and are deployed in software pipelines.
  • Evaluation of such systems is often outcome-centric.
  • Inspired by the structured representation of conventional software systems as graphs, we introduce Graphectory to systematically encode the temporal and semantic relations in such systems.

Why It Matters For Eval

  • Agentic systems are modern software systems: they consist of orchestrated modules, expose interfaces, and are deployed in software pipelines.
  • Evaluation of such systems is often outcome-centric.

Researcher Checklist

  • Gap: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Gap: Evaluation mode is explicit

    No clear evaluation mode extracted.

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Pass: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    Detected: SWE-bench

  • Gap: Metric reporting is present

    No metric terms extracted.

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.