Human Feedback Types
missingNone explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Deep research agents (DRAs) conduct long-horizon reasoning, search, and literature synthesis to provide long-form answers to complex, domain-specific questions."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Yi Wen, Xiangjue Dong, Bingxuan Li, Hangxiao Zhu +3 more
Published
Oct 29, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Low
Usefulness score
0/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
15% (Low)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Oct 29, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.
All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.
What to verify
Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.
Main weakness
This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Deep research agents (DRAs) conduct long-horizon reasoning, search, and literature synthesis to provide long-form answers to complex, domain-specific questions. These agents are typically trained and evaluated on fully specified user queries. However, real-world user queries can often be underspecified. We introduce UNDERSPEC-DR, a framework for systematically evaluating how underspecified queries affect agents' final answer quality and intermediate search behavior. Across three DRAs we evaluated, underspecification substantially reduces how well DRA's answers fulfill users' information needs, even though they remain grounded in cited evidence. Our analysis of intermediate search behavior suggests a possible explanation: DRAs conduct broader searches that draw less on the original user query but rely more on their learned prior during training, which can be misaligned with users' intent. Our findings reveal the vulnerability of current DRAs to underspecified user queries and inform future efforts to build DRAs that proactively recognize when additional user input is needed to reliably complete deep research tasks.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Deep research agents (DRAs) conduct long-horizon reasoning, search, and literature synthesis to provide long-form answers to complex, domain-specific questions."
None explicit
Validate eval design from full paper text.
"Deep research agents (DRAs) conduct long-horizon reasoning, search, and literature synthesis to provide long-form answers to complex, domain-specific questions."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Deep research agents (DRAs) conduct long-horizon reasoning, search, and literature synthesis to provide long-form answers to complex, domain-specific questions."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"Deep research agents (DRAs) conduct long-horizon reasoning, search, and literature synthesis to provide long-form answers to complex, domain-specific questions."
Not extracted
No metric anchors detected.
"Deep research agents (DRAs) conduct long-horizon reasoning, search, and literature synthesis to provide long-form answers to complex, domain-specific questions."
No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.
No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.
Deep research agents (DRAs) conduct long-horizon reasoning, search, and literature synthesis to provide long-form answers to complex, domain-specific questions.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
No explicit human feedback protocol detected.
Evaluation mode is explicit
No clear evaluation mode extracted.
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.
Metric reporting is present
No metric terms extracted.