Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Alloc-MoE: Budget-Aware Expert Activation Allocation for Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Inference

Baihui Liu, Kaiyuan Tian, Wei Wang, Zhaoning Zhang, Linbo Qiao, Dongsheng Li · Apr 9, 2026 · Citations: 0

Data freshness

Extraction: Fresh

Check recency before relying on this page for active eval decisions. Use stale pages as context and verify against current hub results.

Metadata refreshed

Apr 9, 2026, 11:50 AM

Recent

Extraction refreshed

Apr 13, 2026, 6:37 AM

Fresh

Extraction source

Persisted extraction

Confidence 0.20

Abstract

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) has become a dominant architecture for scaling large language models due to their sparse activation mechanism. However, the substantial number of expert activations creates a critical latency bottleneck during inference, especially in resource-constrained deployment scenarios. Existing approaches that reduce expert activations potentially lead to severe model performance degradation. In this work, we introduce the concept of \emph{activation budget} as a constraint on the number of expert activations and propose Alloc-MoE, a unified framework that optimizes budget allocation coordinately at both the layer and token levels to minimize performance degradation. At the layer level, we introduce Alloc-L, which leverages sensitivity profiling and dynamic programming to determine the optimal allocation of expert activations across layers. At the token level, we propose Alloc-T, which dynamically redistributes activations based on routing scores, optimizing budget allocation without increasing latency. Extensive experiments across multiple MoE models demonstrate that Alloc-MoE maintains model performance under a constrained activation budget. Especially, Alloc-MoE achieves $1.15\times$ prefill and $1.34\times$ decode speedups on DeepSeek-V2-Lite at half of the original budget.

Low-signal caution for protocol decisions

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • Extraction flags indicate low-signal or possible false-positive protocol mapping.
  • Extraction confidence is 0.20 (below strong-reference threshold).
  • No explicit evaluation mode was extracted from available metadata.

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

Background context only.

Main weakness

Extraction flags indicate low-signal or possible false-positive protocol mapping.

Trust level

Low

Eval-Fit Score

0/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

HFEPX Fit

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence: Low

Field Provenance & Confidence

Each key protocol field shows extraction state, confidence band, and data source so you can decide whether to trust it directly or validate from full text.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction missing

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

Evidence snippet: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) has become a dominant architecture for scaling large language models due to their sparse activation mechanism.

Evaluation Modes

missing

None explicit

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction missing

Validate eval design from full paper text.

Evidence snippet: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) has become a dominant architecture for scaling large language models due to their sparse activation mechanism.

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction missing

No explicit QC controls found.

Evidence snippet: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) has become a dominant architecture for scaling large language models due to their sparse activation mechanism.

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction missing

No benchmark anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) has become a dominant architecture for scaling large language models due to their sparse activation mechanism.

Reported Metrics

partial

Latency

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction evidenced

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

Evidence snippet: However, the substantial number of expert activations creates a critical latency bottleneck during inference, especially in resource-constrained deployment scenarios.

Rater Population

partial

Domain Experts

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction evidenced

Helpful for staffing comparability.

Evidence snippet: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) has become a dominant architecture for scaling large language models due to their sparse activation mechanism.

Human Data Lens

  • Uses human feedback: No
  • Feedback types: None
  • Rater population: Domain Experts
  • Unit of annotation: Unknown
  • Expertise required: Coding
  • Extraction source: Persisted extraction

Evaluation Lens

  • Evaluation modes:
  • Agentic eval: None
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Confidence: 0.20
  • Flags: low_signal, possible_false_positive

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported Metrics

latency

Research Brief

Deterministic synthesis

In this work, we introduce the concept of activation budget as a constraint on the number of expert activations and propose Alloc-MoE, a unified framework that optimizes budget allocation coordinately at both the layer and token levels to… HFEPX protocol signal is limited in abstract-level metadata, so treat it as adjacent context. Updated from current HFEPX corpus.

Generated Apr 13, 2026, 6:37 AM · Grounded in abstract + metadata only

Key Takeaways

  • In this work, we introduce the concept of activation budget as a constraint on the number of expert activations and propose Alloc-MoE, a unified framework that optimizes budget…
  • At the layer level, we introduce Alloc-L, which leverages sensitivity profiling and dynamic programming to determine the optimal allocation of expert activations across layers.
  • Abstract shows limited direct human-feedback or evaluation-protocol detail; use as adjacent methodological context.

Researcher Actions

  • Treat this as method context, then pivot to protocol-specific HFEPX hubs.
  • Identify benchmark choices from full text before operationalizing conclusions.
  • Validate metric comparability (latency).

Caveats

  • Generated from title, abstract, and extracted metadata only; full-paper implementation details are not parsed.
  • Low-signal flag detected: protocol relevance may be indirect.

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • In this work, we introduce the concept of activation budget as a constraint on the number of expert activations and propose Alloc-MoE, a unified framework that optimizes budget allocation coordinately at both the layer and token levels to…
  • At the layer level, we introduce Alloc-L, which leverages sensitivity profiling and dynamic programming to determine the optimal allocation of expert activations across layers.
  • At the token level, we propose Alloc-T, which dynamically redistributes activations based on routing scores, optimizing budget allocation without increasing latency.

Why It Matters For Eval

  • Abstract shows limited direct human-feedback or evaluation-protocol detail; use as adjacent methodological context.

Researcher Checklist

  • Gap: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Gap: Evaluation mode is explicit

    No clear evaluation mode extracted.

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Gap: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Pass: Metric reporting is present

    Detected: latency

Category-Adjacent Papers (Broader Context)

These papers are nearby in arXiv category and useful for broader context, but not necessarily protocol-matched to this paper.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.