Skip to content
← Back to explorer

MemCollab: Cross-Agent Memory Collaboration via Contrastive Trajectory Distillation

Yurui Chang, Yiran Wu, Qingyun Wu, Lu Lin · Mar 24, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this paper page

Coverage: Stale

Use this page to decide whether the paper is strong enough to influence an eval design. It summarizes the abstract plus available structured metadata. If the signal is thin, use it as background context and compare it against stronger hub pages before making protocol choices.

Best use

Background context only

Metadata: Stale

Trust level

Provisional

Signals: Stale

What still needs checking

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Signal confidence unavailable

Abstract

Large language model (LLM)-based agents rely on memory mechanisms to reuse knowledge from past problem-solving experiences. Existing approaches typically construct memory in a per-agent manner, tightly coupling stored knowledge to a single model's reasoning style. In modern deployments with heterogeneous agents, a natural question arises: can a single memory system be shared across different models? We found that naively transferring memory between agents often degrades performance, as such memory entangles task-relevant knowledge with agent-specific biases. To address this challenge, we propose MemCollab, a collaborative memory framework that constructs agent-agnostic memory by contrasting reasoning trajectories generated by different agents on the same task. This contrastive process distills abstract reasoning constraints that capture shared task-level invariants while suppressing agent-specific artifacts. We further introduce a task-aware retrieval mechanism that conditions memory access on task category, ensuring that only relevant constraints are used at inference time. Experiments on mathematical reasoning and code generation benchmarks demonstrate that MemCollab consistently improves both accuracy and inference-time efficiency across diverse agents, including cross-modal-family settings. Our results show that the collaboratively constructed memory can function as a shared reasoning resource for diverse LLM-based agents.

Use caution before copying this protocol

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Trust level

Provisional

Eval-Fit Score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

HFEPX Fit

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence: Provisional

What This Page Found In The Paper

Each field below shows whether the signal looked explicit, partial, or missing in the available metadata. Use this to judge what is safe to trust directly and what still needs full-paper validation.

Human Feedback Types

provisional

None explicit

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

Evidence snippet: Large language model (LLM)-based agents rely on memory mechanisms to reuse knowledge from past problem-solving experiences.

Evaluation Modes

provisional

Automatic metrics

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

Includes extracted eval setup.

Evidence snippet: Large language model (LLM)-based agents rely on memory mechanisms to reuse knowledge from past problem-solving experiences.

Quality Controls

provisional

Not reported

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

No explicit QC controls found.

Evidence snippet: Large language model (LLM)-based agents rely on memory mechanisms to reuse knowledge from past problem-solving experiences.

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional

Not extracted

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

No benchmark anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: Large language model (LLM)-based agents rely on memory mechanisms to reuse knowledge from past problem-solving experiences.

Reported Metrics

provisional

Accuracy

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

Evidence snippet: Experiments on mathematical reasoning and code generation benchmarks demonstrate that MemCollab consistently improves both accuracy and inference-time efficiency across diverse agents, including cross-modal-family settings.

Rater Population

provisional

Unknown

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

Rater source not explicitly reported.

Evidence snippet: Large language model (LLM)-based agents rely on memory mechanisms to reuse knowledge from past problem-solving experiences.

Human Data Lens

This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Lens

Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.

  • Potential evaluation modes: Automatic metrics
  • Potential metric signals: Accuracy
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Large language model (LLM)-based agents rely on memory mechanisms to reuse knowledge from past problem-solving experiences.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Large language model (LLM)-based agents rely on memory mechanisms to reuse knowledge from past problem-solving experiences.
  • Existing approaches typically construct memory in a per-agent manner, tightly coupling stored knowledge to a single model's reasoning style.
  • In modern deployments with heterogeneous agents, a natural question arises: can a single memory system be shared across different models?

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.