Human Feedback Types
missingNone explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Clinical notes capture most of what is documented about a patient's care, but they cannot be used for research until protected health information (PHI) is removed."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Jose D. Posada, Somalee Datta, Priya Desai
Published
Oct 5, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Low
Usefulness score
0/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
35% (Low)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Oct 5, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.
All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.
What to verify
Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.
Main weakness
This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Clinical notes capture most of what is documented about a patient's care, but they cannot be used for research until protected health information (PHI) is removed. De-identification is often treated as a detection problem. Detection alone is not sufficient: redaction strips clinical content along with identifiers, date blanking destroys the temporal intervals needed for longitudinal analysis, and assigning a fresh random surrogate at each occurrence breaks links between a patient's notes. We present TIDE 2.0, an MIT-licensed engine with two separable stages: an interchangeable recognizer and a keyed anonymizer. Both run on hardware the institution owns. Surrogates are generated cryptographically with no stored linkage table. Dates shift by a per-patient, interval-preserving offset; each value receives the same surrogate across all occurrences under a given key; and a release produced under a new key cannot be linked to earlier releases. We also release TIDE2-Sentry, a recognizer distilled from a large language model. On two gold-annotated corpora from two institutions, the default configuration reached span-level recall of 0.88 in-domain and 0.77 on the second institution's corpus, at precision 0.88 and 0.87. We report recall and precision per category alongside these aggregates. The engine is open source, and the recognizer is available under a gated research-use agreement, so institutions can run, inspect and extend both within their own environments.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Clinical notes capture most of what is documented about a patient's care, but they cannot be used for research until protected health information (PHI) is removed."
Automatic Metrics
Includes extracted eval setup.
"Clinical notes capture most of what is documented about a patient's care, but they cannot be used for research until protected health information (PHI) is removed."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Clinical notes capture most of what is documented about a patient's care, but they cannot be used for research until protected health information (PHI) is removed."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"Clinical notes capture most of what is documented about a patient's care, but they cannot be used for research until protected health information (PHI) is removed."
Precision, Recall, Agreement
Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.
"On two gold-annotated corpora from two institutions, the default configuration reached span-level recall of 0.88 in-domain and 0.77 on the second institution's corpus, at precision 0.88 and 0.87."
No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.
Clinical notes capture most of what is documented about a patient's care, but they cannot be used for research until protected health information (PHI) is removed.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
No explicit human feedback protocol detected.
Evaluation mode is explicit
Detected: Automatic Metrics
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.
Metric reporting is present
Detected: precision, recall, agreement