Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

HFEPX · Eval paper review

Bridging Graph and Pairwise Learning for Gene Regulatory Network Inference from scRNA-seq Data

Hang Li, Jiaxin Qi, Yan Cui, Yuhua Zheng +1 more

Published

Nov 10, 2026

Citations

0

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

40/100 (Low)

Extraction confidence

45% (Low)

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Rater population

Not reported

Signals refreshed

Nov 10, 2026

Should you rely on this paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

Background context only.

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Main weakness

The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.

Human feedback signal
Detected
From extracted signals
Evaluation signal
Weak or implicit
Validate from full paper
Usefulness for eval research
40/100
Adjacent candidate

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Abstract

Motivation: Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) capture the underlying interactions through which transcription factors (TFs) regulate genes. Based on gene expression data, existing GRN inference approaches generally fall into two categories: graph-based methods, which model the GRN as a whole graph, and pairwise-based methods, which decompose the GRN into individual TF-target gene pairs for modeling. However, each approach exhibits limitations that are precisely the strengths of its counterpart. Graph-based methods tend to overfit due to their reliance on a single training graph, whereas pairwise-based methods benefit from abundant TF-target training pairs. In contrast, pairwise-based methods overlook the global topological structure, which is essential for comprehensively capturing regulatory mechanisms. Results: To address these limitations, we propose scGPL, an end-to-end unified framework that jointly models global regulatory topology and local interactions. scGPL extracts macro-level features from the global regulatory graph and introduces a dynamic, importance-guided subgraph sampling mechanism to capture fine-grained local dependencies. By fusing global representations with subgraph-enhanced local features, our framework bridges the gap between the two paradigms, incorporating essential whole-graph topological dependencies while retaining the data abundance advantage of pairwise methods. Extensive experiments on seven benchmark datasets demonstrate that scGPL consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance, with up to 13.7% improvement over the strongest baseline, validating the effectiveness of our integrative design. Availability and implementation: The source code is maintained on GitHub (https://github.com/talent-hang/scGPL), and the datasets and versioned releases are archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21608485 for reproducibility.

What we could verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

partial

Pairwise Preference

Directly usable for protocol triage.

"Motivation: Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) capture the underlying interactions through which transcription factors (TFs) regulate genes."

Evaluation Modes

missing

None explicit

Validate eval design from full paper text.

"Motivation: Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) capture the underlying interactions through which transcription factors (TFs) regulate genes."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Motivation: Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) capture the underlying interactions through which transcription factors (TFs) regulate genes."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Motivation: Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) capture the underlying interactions through which transcription factors (TFs) regulate genes."

Reported Metrics

missing

Not extracted

No metric anchors detected.

"Motivation: Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) capture the underlying interactions through which transcription factors (TFs) regulate genes."

Benchmarks and datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported metrics

No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.

Human feedback details
Uses human feedback
Yes
Feedback types
Pairwise Preference
Rater population
Not reported
Unit of annotation
Pairwise (inferred)
Expertise required
Coding
Evaluation details
Evaluation modes
None
Agentic eval
None
Quality controls
Not reported
Evidence quality
Low
Use this page as
Background context only

Research brief

Metadata summary

Motivation: Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) capture the underlying interactions through which transcription factors (TFs) regulate genes.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key takeaways

  • Motivation: Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) capture the underlying interactions through which transcription factors (TFs) regulate genes.
  • Based on gene expression data, existing GRN inference approaches generally fall into two categories: graph-based methods, which model the GRN as a whole graph, and pairwise-based methods, which decompose the GRN into individual TF-target gene pairs for modeling.
  • However, each approach exhibits limitations that are precisely the strengths of its counterpart.

Researcher actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Contribution summary

  • Motivation: Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) capture the underlying interactions through which transcription factors (TFs) regulate genes.
  • Based on gene expression data, existing GRN inference approaches generally fall into two categories: graph-based methods, which model the GRN as a whole graph, and pairwise-based methods, which decompose the GRN into individual TF-target…

Why it matters for eval

  • Extensive experiments on seven benchmark datasets demonstrate that scGPL consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance, with up to 13.7% improvement over the strongest baseline, validating the effectiveness of our integrative design.

Researcher checklist

  • Human feedback protocol is explicit

    Detected: Pairwise Preference

  • Evaluation mode is explicit

    No clear evaluation mode extracted.

  • Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Metric reporting is present

    No metric terms extracted.