Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Schema on the Inside: A Two-Phase Fine-Tuning Method for High-Efficiency Text-to-SQL at Scale

Chinmay Soni, Shivam Chourasia, Gaurav Kumar, Hitesh Kapoor · Mar 25, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics General Tool Use
Open arXiv Open DOI Find Implementation RSS feed Shortlist (0)

How to use this page

Low trust

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Evidence quality

Low

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

Applying large, proprietary API-based language models to text-to-SQL tasks poses a significant industry challenge: reliance on massive, schema-heavy prompts results in prohibitive per-token API costs and high latency, hindering scalable production deployment. We present a specialized, self-hosted 8B-parameter model designed for a conversational bot in CriQ, a sister app to Dream11, India's largest fantasy sports platform with over 250 million users, that answers user queries about cricket statistics. Our novel two-phase supervised fine-tuning approach enables the model to internalize the entire database schema, eliminating the need for long-context prompts. This reduces input tokens by over 99%, from a 17k-token baseline to fewer than 100, and replaces costly external API calls with efficient local inference. The resulting system achieves 98.4% execution success and 92.5% semantic accuracy, substantially outperforming a prompt-engineered baseline using Google's Gemini Flash 2.0 (95.6% execution, 89.4% semantic accuracy). These results demonstrate a practical path toward high-precision, low-latency text-to-SQL applications using domain-specialized, self-hosted language models in large-scale production environments.

Low-signal caution for protocol decisions

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.
Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

Main weakness

The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

25/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Detected

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 45%

If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here:

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub Tool-Use Eval Hub

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Applying large, proprietary API-based language models to text-to-SQL tasks poses a significant industry challenge: reliance on massive, schema-heavy prompts results in prohibitive per-token API costs and high latency, hindering scalable production deployment."

Evaluation Modes

partial

Automatic Metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Applying large, proprietary API-based language models to text-to-SQL tasks poses a significant industry challenge: reliance on massive, schema-heavy prompts results in prohibitive per-token API costs and high latency, hindering scalable production deployment."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Applying large, proprietary API-based language models to text-to-SQL tasks poses a significant industry challenge: reliance on massive, schema-heavy prompts results in prohibitive per-token API costs and high latency, hindering scalable production deployment."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Applying large, proprietary API-based language models to text-to-SQL tasks poses a significant industry challenge: reliance on massive, schema-heavy prompts results in prohibitive per-token API costs and high latency, hindering scalable production deployment."

Reported Metrics

partial

Accuracy, Precision

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"The resulting system achieves 98.4% execution success and 92.5% semantic accuracy, substantially outperforming a prompt-engineered baseline using Google's Gemini Flash 2.0 (95.6% execution, 89.4% semantic accuracy)."

Human Feedback Details

  • Uses human feedback: No
  • Feedback types: None
  • Rater population: Not reported
  • Expertise required: General

Evaluation Details

  • Evaluation modes: Automatic Metrics
  • Agentic eval: Tool Use
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Evidence quality: Low
  • Use this page as: Background context only

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported Metrics

accuracyprecision

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Applying large, proprietary API-based language models to text-to-SQL tasks poses a significant industry challenge: reliance on massive, schema-heavy prompts results in prohibitive per-token API costs and high latency, hindering scalable production deployment.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Applying large, proprietary API-based language models to text-to-SQL tasks poses a significant industry challenge: reliance on massive, schema-heavy prompts results in prohibitive per-token API costs and high latency, hindering scalable production deployment.
  • We present a specialized, self-hosted 8B-parameter model designed for a conversational bot in CriQ, a sister app to Dream11, India's largest fantasy sports platform with over 250 million users, that answers user queries about cricket statistics.
  • Our novel two-phase supervised fine-tuning approach enables the model to internalize the entire database schema, eliminating the need for long-context prompts.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics, Tool-use evaluation) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Accuracy

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • We present a specialized, self-hosted 8B-parameter model designed for a conversational bot in CriQ, a sister app to Dream11, India's largest fantasy sports platform with over 250 million users, that answers user queries about cricket…
  • This reduces input tokens by over 99%, from a 17k-token baseline to fewer than 100, and replaces costly external API calls with efficient local inference.
  • The resulting system achieves 98.4% execution success and 92.5% semantic accuracy, substantially outperforming a prompt-engineered baseline using Google's Gemini Flash 2.0 (95.6% execution, 89.4% semantic accuracy).

Researcher Checklist

  • Gap: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Pass: Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Automatic Metrics

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Gap: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Pass: Metric reporting is present

    Detected: accuracy, precision

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Create Account & Post a Job
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
Learn About Managed Service
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.
Join Now