Skip to content
← Back to explorer

To See is Not to Master: Teaching LLMs to Use Private Libraries for Code Generation

Yitong Zhang, Chengze Li, Ruize Chen, Guowei Yang, Xiaoran Jia, Yijie Ren, Jia Li · Mar 16, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Low trust

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Evidence quality

Low

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong potential for code generation, yet they remain limited in private-library-oriented code generation, where the goal is to generate code using APIs from private libraries. Existing approaches mainly rely on retrieving private-library API documentation and injecting relevant knowledge into the context at inference time. However, our study shows that this is insufficient: even given accurate required knowledge, LLMs still struggle to invoke private-library APIs effectively. To address this limitation, we propose PriCoder, an approach that teaches LLMs to invoke private-library APIs through automatically synthesized data. Specifically, PriCoder models private-library data synthesis as the construction of a graph, and alternates between two graph operators: (1) Progressive Graph Evolution, which improves data diversity by progressively synthesizing more diverse training samples from basic ones, and (2) Multidimensional Graph Pruning, which improves data quality through a rigorous filtering pipeline. To support rigorous evaluation, we construct two new benchmarks based on recently released libraries that are unfamiliar to the tested models. Experiments on three mainstream LLMs show that PriCoder substantially improves private-library-oriented code generation, yielding gains of over 20% in pass@1 in many settings, while causing negligible impact on general code generation capability. Our code and benchmarks are publicly available at https://github.com/eniacode/PriCoder.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
  • The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

0/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Detected

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 35%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong potential for code generation, yet they remain limited in private-library-oriented code generation, where the goal is to generate code using APIs from private libraries."

Evaluation Modes

partial

Automatic Metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong potential for code generation, yet they remain limited in private-library-oriented code generation, where the goal is to generate code using APIs from private libraries."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong potential for code generation, yet they remain limited in private-library-oriented code generation, where the goal is to generate code using APIs from private libraries."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong potential for code generation, yet they remain limited in private-library-oriented code generation, where the goal is to generate code using APIs from private libraries."

Reported Metrics

partial

Pass@1

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"Experiments on three mainstream LLMs show that PriCoder substantially improves private-library-oriented code generation, yielding gains of over 20% in pass@1 in many settings, while causing negligible impact on general code generation capability."

Human Feedback Details

  • Uses human feedback: No
  • Feedback types: None
  • Rater population: Not reported
  • Expertise required: Coding

Evaluation Details

  • Evaluation modes: Automatic Metrics
  • Agentic eval: None
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Evidence quality: Low
  • Use this page as: Background context only

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported Metrics

pass@1

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong potential for code generation, yet they remain limited in private-library-oriented code generation, where the goal is to generate code using APIs from private libraries.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong potential for code generation, yet they remain limited in private-library-oriented code generation, where the goal is to generate code using APIs from private libraries.
  • Existing approaches mainly rely on retrieving private-library API documentation and injecting relevant knowledge into the context at inference time.
  • However, our study shows that this is insufficient: even given accurate required knowledge, LLMs still struggle to invoke private-library APIs effectively.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Tool-use evaluation) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • To address this limitation, we propose PriCoder, an approach that teaches LLMs to invoke private-library APIs through automatically synthesized data.
  • To support rigorous evaluation, we construct two new benchmarks based on recently released libraries that are unfamiliar to the tested models.
  • Our code and benchmarks are publicly available at https://github.com/eniacode/PriCoder.

Why It Matters For Eval

  • To support rigorous evaluation, we construct two new benchmarks based on recently released libraries that are unfamiliar to the tested models.
  • Our code and benchmarks are publicly available at https://github.com/eniacode/PriCoder.

Researcher Checklist

  • Gap: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Pass: Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Automatic Metrics

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Gap: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Pass: Metric reporting is present

    Detected: pass@1

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.