Skip to content
← Back to explorer

BitDance: Scaling Autoregressive Generative Models with Binary Tokens

Yuang Ai, Jiaming Han, Shaobin Zhuang, Weijia Mao, Xuefeng Hu, Ziyan Yang, Zhenheng Yang, Yali Wang, Huaibo Huang, Xiangyu Yue, Hao Chen · Feb 15, 2026 · Citations: 0

Data freshness

Extraction: Stale

Check recency before relying on this page for active eval decisions. Use stale pages as context and verify against current hub results.

Metadata refreshed

Mar 13, 2026, 10:15 AM

Stale

Extraction refreshed

Mar 13, 2026, 10:15 AM

Stale

Extraction source

Persisted extraction

Confidence unavailable

Abstract

We present BitDance, a scalable autoregressive (AR) image generator that predicts binary visual tokens instead of codebook indices. With high-entropy binary latents, BitDance lets each token represent up to $2^{256}$ states, yielding a compact yet highly expressive discrete representation. Sampling from such a huge token space is difficult with standard classification. To resolve this, BitDance uses a binary diffusion head: instead of predicting an index with softmax, it employs continuous-space diffusion to generate the binary tokens. Furthermore, we propose next-patch diffusion, a new decoding method that predicts multiple tokens in parallel with high accuracy, greatly speeding up inference. On ImageNet 256x256, BitDance achieves an FID of 1.24, the best among AR models. With next-patch diffusion, BitDance beats state-of-the-art parallel AR models that use 1.4B parameters, while using 5.4x fewer parameters (260M) and achieving 8.7x speedup. For text-to-image generation, BitDance trains on large-scale multimodal tokens and generates high-resolution, photorealistic images efficiently, showing strong performance and favorable scaling. When generating 1024x1024 images, BitDance achieves a speedup of over 30x compared to prior AR models. We release code and models to facilitate further research on AR foundation models. Code and models are available at: https://github.com/shallowdream204/BitDance.

Low-signal caution for protocol decisions

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Trust level

Provisional

Eval-Fit Score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

HFEPX Fit

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence: Provisional

Field Provenance & Confidence

Each key protocol field shows extraction state, confidence band, and data source so you can decide whether to trust it directly or validate from full text.

Human Feedback Types

provisional

None explicit

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

Evidence snippet: We present BitDance, a scalable autoregressive (AR) image generator that predicts binary visual tokens instead of codebook indices.

Evaluation Modes

provisional

Automatic metrics

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Includes extracted eval setup.

Evidence snippet: We present BitDance, a scalable autoregressive (AR) image generator that predicts binary visual tokens instead of codebook indices.

Quality Controls

provisional

Not reported

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No explicit QC controls found.

Evidence snippet: We present BitDance, a scalable autoregressive (AR) image generator that predicts binary visual tokens instead of codebook indices.

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional

Not extracted

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No benchmark anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: We present BitDance, a scalable autoregressive (AR) image generator that predicts binary visual tokens instead of codebook indices.

Reported Metrics

provisional

Accuracy

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

Evidence snippet: Furthermore, we propose next-patch diffusion, a new decoding method that predicts multiple tokens in parallel with high accuracy, greatly speeding up inference.

Rater Population

provisional

Unknown

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Rater source not explicitly reported.

Evidence snippet: We present BitDance, a scalable autoregressive (AR) image generator that predicts binary visual tokens instead of codebook indices.

Human Data Lens

Structured extraction is still processing. Below are provisional signals inferred from abstract text only.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Lens

Evaluation fields are currently inferred heuristically from abstract text.

  • Potential evaluation modes: Automatic metrics
  • Potential metric signals: Accuracy
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Deterministic synthesis

We present BitDance, a scalable autoregressive (AR) image generator that predicts binary visual tokens instead of codebook indices.

Generated Mar 13, 2026, 10:15 AM · Grounded in abstract + metadata only

Key Takeaways

  • We present BitDance, a scalable autoregressive (AR) image generator that predicts binary visual tokens instead of codebook indices.
  • With high-entropy binary latents, BitDance lets each token represent up to $2^{256}$ states, yielding a compact yet highly expressive discrete representation.
  • Sampling from such a huge token space is difficult with standard classification.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.