Skip to content
← Back to explorer

LaSER: Internalizing Explicit Reasoning into Latent Space for Dense Retrieval

Jiajie Jin, Yanzhao Zhang, Mingxin Li, Dingkun Long, Pengjun Xie, Yutao Zhu, Zhicheng Dou · Mar 2, 2026 · Citations: 0

Data freshness

Extraction: Fresh

Check recency before relying on this page for active eval decisions. Use stale pages as context and verify against current hub results.

Metadata refreshed

Mar 2, 2026, 4:11 AM

Recent

Extraction refreshed

Mar 5, 2026, 1:40 PM

Fresh

Extraction source

Persisted extraction

Confidence 0.45

Abstract

LLMs have fundamentally transformed dense retrieval, upgrading backbones from discriminative encoders to generative architectures. However, a critical disconnect remains: while LLMs possess strong reasoning capabilities, current retrievers predominantly utilize them as static encoders, leaving their potential for complex reasoning unexplored. To address this, existing approaches typically adopt rewrite-then-retrieve pipelines to generate explicit CoT rationales before retrieval. However, this incurs prohibitive latency. In this paper, we propose LaSER, a novel self-distillation framework that internalizes explicit reasoning into the latent space of dense retrievers. Operating on a shared LLM backbone, LaSER introduces a dual-view training mechanism: an Explicit view that explicitly encodes ground-truth reasoning paths, and a Latent view that performs implicit latent thinking. To bridge the gap between these views, we design a multi-grained alignment strategy. Beyond standard output alignment, we introduce a trajectory alignment mechanism that synchronizes the intermediate latent states of the latent path with the semantic progression of the explicit reasoning segments. This allows the retriever to think silently and effectively without autoregressive text generation. Extensive experiments on both in-domain and out-of-domain reasoning-intensive benchmarks demonstrate that LaSER significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. Furthermore, analyses across diverse backbones and model scales validate the robustness of our approach, confirming that our unified learning framework is essential for eliciting effective latent thinking. Our method successfully combines the reasoning depth of explicit CoT pipelines with the inference efficiency of standard dense retrievers.

Low-signal caution for protocol decisions

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • Extraction confidence is 0.45 (below strong-reference threshold).

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Eval-Fit Score

25/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Detected

HFEPX Fit

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence: Low

Field Provenance & Confidence

Each key protocol field shows extraction state, confidence band, and data source so you can decide whether to trust it directly or validate from full text.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

Evaluation Modes

partial

Automatic Metrics

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction

Includes extracted eval setup.

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction

No explicit QC controls found.

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction

No benchmark anchors detected.

Reported Metrics

partial

Latency

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

Rater Population

missing

Unknown

Confidence: Low Source: Persisted extraction

Rater source not explicitly reported.

Human Data Lens

  • Uses human feedback: No
  • Feedback types: None
  • Rater population: Unknown
  • Unit of annotation: Trajectory
  • Expertise required: General
  • Extraction source: Persisted extraction

Evaluation Lens

  • Evaluation modes: Automatic Metrics
  • Agentic eval: Long Horizon
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Confidence: 0.45
  • Flags: ambiguous, runtime_fallback_extraction

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported Metrics

latency

Research Brief

Deterministic synthesis

In this paper, we propose LaSER, a novel self-distillation framework that internalizes explicit reasoning into the latent space of dense retrievers. HFEPX signals include Automatic Metrics, Long Horizon with confidence 0.45. Updated from current HFEPX corpus.

Generated Mar 5, 2026, 1:40 PM · Grounded in abstract + metadata only

Key Takeaways

  • In this paper, we propose LaSER, a novel self-distillation framework that internalizes explicit reasoning into the latent space of dense retrievers.
  • Beyond standard output alignment, we introduce a trajectory alignment mechanism that synchronizes the intermediate latent states of the latent path with the semantic progression…
  • Extensive experiments on both in-domain and out-of-domain reasoning-intensive benchmarks demonstrate that LaSER significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.

Researcher Actions

  • Treat this as method context, then pivot to protocol-specific HFEPX hubs.
  • Identify benchmark choices from full text before operationalizing conclusions.
  • Validate metric comparability (latency).

Caveats

  • Generated from title, abstract, and extracted metadata only; full-paper implementation details are not parsed.
  • Extraction confidence is probabilistic and should be validated for critical decisions.

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • In this paper, we propose LaSER, a novel self-distillation framework that internalizes explicit reasoning into the latent space of dense retrievers.
  • Beyond standard output alignment, we introduce a trajectory alignment mechanism that synchronizes the intermediate latent states of the latent path with the semantic progression of the explicit reasoning segments.
  • Extensive experiments on both in-domain and out-of-domain reasoning-intensive benchmarks demonstrate that LaSER significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.

Why It Matters For Eval

  • Extensive experiments on both in-domain and out-of-domain reasoning-intensive benchmarks demonstrate that LaSER significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.

Researcher Checklist

  • Gap: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Pass: Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Automatic Metrics

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Gap: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Pass: Metric reporting is present

    Detected: latency

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.