Human Feedback Types
provisional (inferred)None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Large language models in Agentic AI systems consume tool schemas and execution results and emit tool invocations as structured data."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Lorenz Kutschka, Bernhard Geiger
Published
May 28, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Provisional
Usefulness score
Unavailable
Extraction confidence
0% (Provisional)
Derived from abstract and metadata only.
Signals refreshed
Jun 17, 2026
Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.
This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.
All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.
What to verify
Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.
Main weakness
This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.
Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Large language models in Agentic AI systems consume tool schemas and execution results and emit tool invocations as structured data. The default language for that exchange, JSON, was designed for application-to-application interchange rather than token efficiency, so its structural elements impose substantial token overhead. Recent work proposes token-optimized alternatives such as TOON (Token-Oriented Object Notation) and TRON (Token Reduced Object Notation) as more compact replacements, but these formats have been evaluated only on isolated comprehension or generation tasks. Whether their token reductions hold inside end-to-end agentic loops therefore remains an open question. We evaluate TOON and TRON on four agentic benchmarks (BFCL, MCPToolBenchPP, MCP-Universe, StableToolBench) and five open-weight LLMs, decoupling input compression from output compression to measure comprehension and generation independently. TRON reduces tokens by up to 27% with accuracy within 14pp of the JSON baseline. TOON achieves up to 18% reduction at a similar 9pp accuracy cost, but additionally cascades on multi-turn parsing failures and collapses parallel tool-call output for most models. The code is available at: https://github.com/lkutschka/notation-matters
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Large language models in Agentic AI systems consume tool schemas and execution results and emit tool invocations as structured data."
Automatic metrics
Includes extracted eval setup.
"Large language models in Agentic AI systems consume tool schemas and execution results and emit tool invocations as structured data."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Large language models in Agentic AI systems consume tool schemas and execution results and emit tool invocations as structured data."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"Large language models in Agentic AI systems consume tool schemas and execution results and emit tool invocations as structured data."
Accuracy
Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.
"TRON reduces tokens by up to 27% with accuracy within 14pp of the JSON baseline."
Unknown
Rater source not explicitly reported.
"Large language models in Agentic AI systems consume tool schemas and execution results and emit tool invocations as structured data."
This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.
Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.
Large language models in Agentic AI systems consume tool schemas and execution results and emit tool invocations as structured data.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.