Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies
← Back to explorer

L2GTX: From Local to Global Time Series Explanations

Ephrem Tibebe Mekonnen, Luca Longo, Lucas Rizzo, Pierpaolo Dondio · Mar 13, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Provisional trust

This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Provisional

Derived from abstract and metadata only.

Abstract

Deep learning models achieve high accuracy in time series classification, yet understanding their class-level decision behaviour remains challenging. Explanations for time series must respect temporal dependencies and identify patterns that recur across instances. Existing approaches face three limitations: model-agnostic XAI methods developed for images and tabular data do not readily extend to time series, global explanation synthesis for time series remains underexplored, and most existing global approaches are model-specific. We propose L2GTX, a model-agnostic framework that generates class-wise global explanations by aggregating local explanations from a representative set of instances. L2GTX extracts clusters of parameterised temporal event primitives, such as increasing or decreasing trends and local extrema, together with their importance scores from instance-level explanations produced by LOMATCE. These clusters are merged across instances to reduce redundancy, and an instance-cluster importance matrix is used to estimate global relevance. Under a user-defined instance selection budget, L2GTX selects representative instances that maximise coverage of influential clusters. Events from the selected instances are then aggregated into concise class-wise global explanations. Experiments on six benchmark time series datasets show that L2GTX produces compact and interpretable global explanations while maintaining stable global faithfulness measured as mean local surrogate fidelity.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Trust level

Provisional

Usefulness score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence 0%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

provisional (inferred)

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Deep learning models achieve high accuracy in time series classification, yet understanding their class-level decision behaviour remains challenging."

Evaluation Modes

provisional (inferred)

Automatic metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Deep learning models achieve high accuracy in time series classification, yet understanding their class-level decision behaviour remains challenging."

Quality Controls

provisional (inferred)

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Deep learning models achieve high accuracy in time series classification, yet understanding their class-level decision behaviour remains challenging."

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Deep learning models achieve high accuracy in time series classification, yet understanding their class-level decision behaviour remains challenging."

Reported Metrics

provisional (inferred)

Accuracy

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"Deep learning models achieve high accuracy in time series classification, yet understanding their class-level decision behaviour remains challenging."

Rater Population

provisional (inferred)

Unknown

Rater source not explicitly reported.

"Deep learning models achieve high accuracy in time series classification, yet understanding their class-level decision behaviour remains challenging."

Human Feedback Details

This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Details

Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.

  • Potential evaluation modes: Automatic metrics
  • Potential metric signals: Accuracy
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Deep learning models achieve high accuracy in time series classification, yet understanding their class-level decision behaviour remains challenging.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Deep learning models achieve high accuracy in time series classification, yet understanding their class-level decision behaviour remains challenging.
  • Explanations for time series must respect temporal dependencies and identify patterns that recur across instances.
  • Existing approaches face three limitations: model-agnostic XAI methods developed for images and tabular data do not readily extend to time series, global explanation synthesis for time series remains underexplored, and most existing global approaches are model-specific.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.