Skip to content
← Back to explorer

L2GTX: From Local to Global Time Series Explanations

Ephrem Tibebe Mekonnen, Luca Longo, Lucas Rizzo, Pierpaolo Dondio · Mar 13, 2026 · Citations: 0

Data freshness

Extraction: Stale

Check recency before relying on this page for active eval decisions. Use stale pages as context and verify against current hub results.

Metadata refreshed

Mar 13, 2026, 3:14 PM

Stale

Extraction refreshed

Mar 13, 2026, 3:14 PM

Stale

Extraction source

Persisted extraction

Confidence unavailable

Abstract

Deep learning models achieve high accuracy in time series classification, yet understanding their class-level decision behaviour remains challenging. Explanations for time series must respect temporal dependencies and identify patterns that recur across instances. Existing approaches face three limitations: model-agnostic XAI methods developed for images and tabular data do not readily extend to time series, global explanation synthesis for time series remains underexplored, and most existing global approaches are model-specific. We propose L2GTX, a model-agnostic framework that generates class-wise global explanations by aggregating local explanations from a representative set of instances. L2GTX extracts clusters of parameterised temporal event primitives, such as increasing or decreasing trends and local extrema, together with their importance scores from instance-level explanations produced by LOMATCE. These clusters are merged across instances to reduce redundancy, and an instance-cluster importance matrix is used to estimate global relevance. Under a user-defined instance selection budget, L2GTX selects representative instances that maximise coverage of influential clusters. Events from the selected instances are then aggregated into concise class-wise global explanations. Experiments on six benchmark time series datasets show that L2GTX produces compact and interpretable global explanations while maintaining stable global faithfulness measured as mean local surrogate fidelity.

Low-signal caution for protocol decisions

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Trust level

Provisional

Eval-Fit Score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

HFEPX Fit

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence: Provisional

Field Provenance & Confidence

Each key protocol field shows extraction state, confidence band, and data source so you can decide whether to trust it directly or validate from full text.

Human Feedback Types

provisional

None explicit

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

Evidence snippet: Deep learning models achieve high accuracy in time series classification, yet understanding their class-level decision behaviour remains challenging.

Evaluation Modes

provisional

Automatic metrics

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Includes extracted eval setup.

Evidence snippet: Deep learning models achieve high accuracy in time series classification, yet understanding their class-level decision behaviour remains challenging.

Quality Controls

provisional

Not reported

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No explicit QC controls found.

Evidence snippet: Deep learning models achieve high accuracy in time series classification, yet understanding their class-level decision behaviour remains challenging.

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional

Not extracted

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No benchmark anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: Deep learning models achieve high accuracy in time series classification, yet understanding their class-level decision behaviour remains challenging.

Reported Metrics

provisional

Accuracy

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

Evidence snippet: Deep learning models achieve high accuracy in time series classification, yet understanding their class-level decision behaviour remains challenging.

Rater Population

provisional

Unknown

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Rater source not explicitly reported.

Evidence snippet: Deep learning models achieve high accuracy in time series classification, yet understanding their class-level decision behaviour remains challenging.

Human Data Lens

Structured extraction is still processing. Below are provisional signals inferred from abstract text only.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Lens

Evaluation fields are currently inferred heuristically from abstract text.

  • Potential evaluation modes: Automatic metrics
  • Potential metric signals: Accuracy
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Deterministic synthesis

Deep learning models achieve high accuracy in time series classification, yet understanding their class-level decision behaviour remains challenging.

Generated Mar 13, 2026, 3:14 PM · Grounded in abstract + metadata only

Key Takeaways

  • Deep learning models achieve high accuracy in time series classification, yet understanding their class-level decision behaviour remains challenging.
  • Explanations for time series must respect temporal dependencies and identify patterns that recur across instances.
  • Existing approaches face three limitations: model-agnostic XAI methods developed for images and tabular data do not readily extend to time series, global explanation synthesis for time series remains underexplored, and most existing global approaches are model-specific.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.