Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

HFEPX · Eval paper review

EpiScreen: Early Epilepsy Detection from Electronic Health Records with Large Language Models

Shuang Zhou, Kai Yu, Zaifu Zhan, Huixue Zhou +4 more

Published

Mar 30, 2026

Citations

0

Trust level

Moderate

Usefulness score

50/100 (Medium)

Extraction confidence

60% (Moderate)

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Rater population

Domain Experts

Signals refreshed

Mar 30, 2026

Should you rely on this paper?

This paper has useful evaluation signal, but protocol completeness is partial; pair it with related papers before deciding implementation strategy.

Use this for comparison and orientation, not as your only source.

Best use

Secondary protocol comparison source

Use if you need

A concrete protocol example with enough signal to inform rater workflow design.

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Main weakness

The abstract does not clearly describe the evaluation setup.

Human feedback signal
Detected
From extracted signals
Evaluation signal
Weak or implicit
Validate from full paper
Usefulness for eval research
50/100
Moderate-confidence candidate

Useful as a secondary reference; validate protocol details against neighboring papers.

Abstract

Epilepsy and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures often present with similar seizure-like manifestations but require fundamentally different management strategies. Misdiagnosis is common and can lead to prolonged diagnostic delays, unnecessary treatments, and substantial patient morbidity. Although prolonged video-electroencephalography is the diagnostic gold standard, its high cost and limited accessibility hinder timely diagnosis. Here, we developed a low-cost, effective approach, EpiScreen, for early epilepsy detection by utilizing routinely collected clinical notes from electronic health records. Through fine-tuning large language models on labeled notes, EpiScreen achieved an AUC of up to 0.875 on the MIMIC-IV dataset and 0.980 on a private cohort of the University of Minnesota. In a clinician-AI collaboration setting, EpiScreen-assisted neurologists outperformed unaided experts by up to 10.9%. Overall, this study demonstrates that EpiScreen supports early epilepsy detection, facilitating timely and cost-effective screening that may reduce diagnostic delays and avoid unnecessary interventions, particularly in resource-limited regions.

What we could verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

strong

Expert Verification

Directly usable for protocol triage.

"Epilepsy and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures often present with similar seizure-like manifestations but require fundamentally different management strategies."

Evaluation Modes

missing

None explicit

Validate eval design from full paper text.

"Epilepsy and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures often present with similar seizure-like manifestations but require fundamentally different management strategies."

Quality Controls

strong

Gold Questions

Calibration/adjudication style controls detected.

"Epilepsy and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures often present with similar seizure-like manifestations but require fundamentally different management strategies."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Epilepsy and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures often present with similar seizure-like manifestations but require fundamentally different management strategies."

Reported Metrics

missing

Not extracted

No metric anchors detected.

"Epilepsy and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures often present with similar seizure-like manifestations but require fundamentally different management strategies."

Rater Population

strong

Domain Experts

Helpful for staffing comparability.

"In a clinician-AI collaboration setting, EpiScreen-assisted neurologists outperformed unaided experts by up to 10.9%."

Benchmarks and datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported metrics

No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.

Human feedback details
Uses human feedback
Yes
Feedback types
Expert Verification
Rater population
Domain Experts
Expertise required
Medicine
Evaluation details
Evaluation modes
None
Agentic eval
None
Quality controls
Gold Questions
Evidence quality
Moderate
Use this page as
Secondary protocol comparison source

Research brief

Metadata summary

Epilepsy and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures often present with similar seizure-like manifestations but require fundamentally different management strategies.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key takeaways

  • Epilepsy and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures often present with similar seizure-like manifestations but require fundamentally different management strategies.
  • Misdiagnosis is common and can lead to prolonged diagnostic delays, unnecessary treatments, and substantial patient morbidity.
  • Although prolonged video-electroencephalography is the diagnostic gold standard, its high cost and limited accessibility hinder timely diagnosis.

Researcher actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended queries

Contribution summary

  • In a clinician-AI collaboration setting, EpiScreen-assisted neurologists outperformed unaided experts by up to 10.9%.

Researcher checklist

  • Human feedback protocol is explicit

    Detected: Expert Verification

  • Evaluation mode is explicit

    No clear evaluation mode extracted.

  • Quality control reporting appears

    Detected: Gold Questions

  • Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Metric reporting is present

    No metric terms extracted.