Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Habibi: Laying the Open-Source Foundation of Unified-Dialectal Arabic Speech Synthesis

Yushen Chen, Junzhe Liu, Yujie Tu, Zhikang Niu, Yuzhe Liang, Chunyu Qiang, Chen Zhang, Kai Yu, Xie Chen · Jan 20, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Low trust

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Evidence quality

Low

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

Arabic spans over 30 spoken varieties, yet no open-source text-to-speech system unifies them. Key barriers include substantial cross-dialect lexical and phonological divergence, scarce synthesis-grade data, and the absence of a standardized multi-dialect evaluation benchmark. We present Habibi, a unified-dialectal Arabic TTS framework that addresses all three. Through a multi-step curation pipeline, we repurpose open-source ASR corpora into TTS training data covering 12+ regional dialects. A linguistically-informed curriculum learning strategy - progressing from Modern Standard Arabic to dialectal data - enables robust zero-shot synthesis without text diacritization. We further release the first standardized multi-dialect Arabic TTS benchmark, comprising over 11,000 utterances across 7 dialect subsets with manually verified transcripts. On this benchmark, our unified model matches or surpasses per-dialect specialized models. Both automatic metrics and human evaluations confirm that Habibi is highly competitive with ElevenLabs' Eleven v3 (alpha) in intelligibility, speaker similarity, and naturalness. Extensive ablations (~8,000 H100 GPU hours, 30+ configurations) validate each design choice. We open-source all checkpoints, training and inference code, and benchmark data - the first such release for multi-dialect Arabic TTS - at https://SWivid.github.io/Habibi/ .

Low-signal caution for protocol decisions

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

Main weakness

The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

27/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Detected

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 45%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Arabic spans over 30 spoken varieties, yet no open-source text-to-speech system unifies them."

Evaluation Modes

partial

Human Eval

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Arabic spans over 30 spoken varieties, yet no open-source text-to-speech system unifies them."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Arabic spans over 30 spoken varieties, yet no open-source text-to-speech system unifies them."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Arabic spans over 30 spoken varieties, yet no open-source text-to-speech system unifies them."

Reported Metrics

partial

Jailbreak success rate

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"Arabic spans over 30 spoken varieties, yet no open-source text-to-speech system unifies them."

Human Feedback Details

  • Uses human feedback: No
  • Feedback types: None
  • Rater population: Not reported
  • Expertise required: Coding

Evaluation Details

  • Evaluation modes: Human Eval
  • Agentic eval: Long Horizon
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Evidence quality: Low
  • Use this page as: Background context only

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported Metrics

jailbreak success rate

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Arabic spans over 30 spoken varieties, yet no open-source text-to-speech system unifies them.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Arabic spans over 30 spoken varieties, yet no open-source text-to-speech system unifies them.
  • Key barriers include substantial cross-dialect lexical and phonological divergence, scarce synthesis-grade data, and the absence of a standardized multi-dialect evaluation benchmark.
  • We present Habibi, a unified-dialectal Arabic TTS framework that addresses all three.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Human evaluation, Long-horizon tasks) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • Key barriers include substantial cross-dialect lexical and phonological divergence, scarce synthesis-grade data, and the absence of a standardized multi-dialect evaluation benchmark.
  • We present Habibi, a unified-dialectal Arabic TTS framework that addresses all three.
  • We further release the first standardized multi-dialect Arabic TTS benchmark, comprising over 11,000 utterances across 7 dialect subsets with manually verified transcripts.

Why It Matters For Eval

  • Key barriers include substantial cross-dialect lexical and phonological divergence, scarce synthesis-grade data, and the absence of a standardized multi-dialect evaluation benchmark.
  • We further release the first standardized multi-dialect Arabic TTS benchmark, comprising over 11,000 utterances across 7 dialect subsets with manually verified transcripts.

Researcher Checklist

  • Gap: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Pass: Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Human Eval

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Gap: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Pass: Metric reporting is present

    Detected: jailbreak success rate

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.