Yushen Chen, Junzhe Liu, Yujie Tu, Zhikang Niu, Yuzhe Liang, Chunyu Qiang, Chen Zhang, Kai Yu, Xie Chen
No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.
Arabic spans over 30 spoken varieties, yet no open-source text-to-speech system unifies them. Key barriers include substantial cross-dialect lexical and phonological divergence, scarce synthesis-grade data, and the absence of a standardized multi-dialect evaluation benchmark. We present Habibi, a unified-dialectal Arabic TTS framework that addresses all three. Through a multi-step curation pipeline, we repurpose open ...
-source ASR corpora into TTS training data covering 12+ regional dialects. A linguistically-informed curriculum learning strategy - progressing from Modern Standard Arabic to dialectal data - enables robust zero-shot synthesis without text diacritization. We further release the first standardized multi-dialect Arabic TTS benchmark, comprising over 11,000 utterances across 7 dialect subsets with manually verified transcripts. On this benchmark, our unified model matches or surpasses per-dialect specialized models. Both automatic metrics and human evaluations confirm that Habibi is highly competitive with ElevenLabs' Eleven v3 (alpha) in intelligibility, speaker similarity, and naturalness. Extensive ablations (~8,000 H100 GPU hours, 30+ configurations) validate each design choice. We open-source all checkpoints, training and inference code, and benchmark data - the first such release for multi-dialect Arabic TTS - at https://SWivid.github.io/Habibi/ .
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Arabic spans over 30 spoken varieties, yet no open-source text-to-speech system unifies them.
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Hardware Notes
Extensive ablations (~8,000 H100 GPU hours, 30+ configurations) validate each design choice.
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (514 stars)
Risk flags
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
Hardware requirements
No verified implementation available
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXNeed human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.