Human Feedback Types
missingNone explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Advances in social media data dissemination enable the provision of real-time information during a crisis."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Thi Huyen Nguyen, Koustav Rudra, Wolfgang Nejdl
Published
Mar 19, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Low
Usefulness score
37/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
45% (Low)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Mar 19, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.
Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.
What to verify
Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.
Main weakness
The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Advances in social media data dissemination enable the provision of real-time information during a crisis. The information comes from different classes, such as infrastructure damages, persons missing or stranded in the affected zone, etc. Existing methods attempted to classify text and images into various humanitarian categories, but their decision-making process remains largely opaque, which affects their deployment in real-life applications. Recent work has sought to improve transparency by extracting textual rationales from tweets to explain predicted classes. However, such explainable classification methods have mostly focused on text, rather than crisis-related images. In this paper, we propose an interpretable-by-design multimodal classification framework. Our method first learns the joint representation of text and image using a visual language transformer model and extracts text rationales. Next, it extracts the image rationales via the mapping with text rationales. Our approach demonstrates how to learn rationales in one modality from another through cross-modal rationale transfer, which saves annotation effort. Finally, tweets are classified based on extracted rationales. Experiments are conducted over CrisisMMD benchmark dataset, and results show that our proposed method boosts the classification Macro-F1 by 2-35% while extracting accurate text tokens and image patches as rationales. Human evaluation also supports the claim that our proposed method is able to retrieve better image rationale patches (12%) that help to identify humanitarian classes. Our method adapts well to new, unseen datasets in zero-shot mode, achieving an accuracy of 80%.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Advances in social media data dissemination enable the provision of real-time information during a crisis."
Human Eval, Automatic Metrics
Includes extracted eval setup.
"Advances in social media data dissemination enable the provision of real-time information during a crisis."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Advances in social media data dissemination enable the provision of real-time information during a crisis."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"Advances in social media data dissemination enable the provision of real-time information during a crisis."
Accuracy, F1, F1 macro
Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.
"Our method adapts well to new, unseen datasets in zero-shot mode, achieving an accuracy of 80%."
No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.
Advances in social media data dissemination enable the provision of real-time information during a crisis.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
No explicit human feedback protocol detected.
Evaluation mode is explicit
Detected: Human Eval, Automatic Metrics
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.
Metric reporting is present
Detected: accuracy, f1, f1 macro