Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Yale-DM-Lab at ArchEHR-QA 2026: Deterministic Grounding and Multi-Pass Evidence Alignment for EHR Question Answering

Elyas Irankhah, Samah Fodeh · Apr 8, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Moderate trust

Use this for comparison and orientation, not as your only source.

Best use

Secondary protocol comparison source

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Evidence quality

Moderate

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

We describe the Yale-DM-Lab system for the ArchEHR-QA 2026 shared task. The task studies patient-authored questions about hospitalization records and contains four subtasks (ST): clinician-interpreted question reformulation, evidence sentence identification, answer generation, and evidence-answer alignment. ST1 uses a dual-model pipeline with Claude Sonnet 4 and GPT-4o to reformulate patient questions into clinician-interpreted questions. ST2-ST4 rely on Azure-hosted model ensembles (o3, GPT-5.2, GPT-5.1, and DeepSeek-R1) combined with few-shot prompting and voting strategies. Our experiments show three main findings. First, model diversity and ensemble voting consistently improve performance compared to single-model baselines. Second, the full clinician answer paragraph is provided as additional prompt context for evidence alignment. Third, results on the development set show that alignment accuracy is mainly limited by reasoning. The best scores on the development set reach 88.81 micro F1 on ST4, 65.72 macro F1 on ST2, 34.01 on ST3, and 33.05 on ST1.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper has useful evaluation signal, but protocol completeness is partial; pair it with related papers before deciding implementation strategy.

Best use

Secondary protocol comparison source

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

Main weakness

No major weakness surfaced.

Trust level

Moderate

Usefulness score

65/100 • Medium

Useful as a secondary reference; validate protocol details against neighboring papers.

Human Feedback Signal

Detected

Evaluation Signal

Detected

Usefulness for eval research

Moderate-confidence candidate

Extraction confidence 70%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

strong

Expert Verification

Directly usable for protocol triage.

"We describe the Yale-DM-Lab system for the ArchEHR-QA 2026 shared task."

Evaluation Modes

strong

Automatic Metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"We describe the Yale-DM-Lab system for the ArchEHR-QA 2026 shared task."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"We describe the Yale-DM-Lab system for the ArchEHR-QA 2026 shared task."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"We describe the Yale-DM-Lab system for the ArchEHR-QA 2026 shared task."

Reported Metrics

strong

Accuracy, F1, F1 macro, F1 micro

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"Third, results on the development set show that alignment accuracy is mainly limited by reasoning."

Rater Population

strong

Domain Experts

Helpful for staffing comparability.

"We describe the Yale-DM-Lab system for the ArchEHR-QA 2026 shared task."

Human Feedback Details

  • Uses human feedback: Yes
  • Feedback types: Expert Verification
  • Rater population: Domain Experts
  • Expertise required: Medicine

Evaluation Details

  • Evaluation modes: Automatic Metrics
  • Agentic eval: None
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Evidence quality: Moderate
  • Use this page as: Secondary protocol comparison source

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported Metrics

accuracyf1f1 macrof1 micro

Research Brief

Metadata summary

We describe the Yale-DM-Lab system for the ArchEHR-QA 2026 shared task.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • We describe the Yale-DM-Lab system for the ArchEHR-QA 2026 shared task.
  • The task studies patient-authored questions about hospitalization records and contains four subtasks (ST): clinician-interpreted question reformulation, evidence sentence identification, answer generation, and evidence-answer alignment.
  • ST1 uses a dual-model pipeline with Claude Sonnet 4 and GPT-4o to reformulate patient questions into clinician-interpreted questions.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • Third, results on the development set show that alignment accuracy is mainly limited by reasoning.
  • The best scores on the development set reach 88.81 micro F1 on ST4, 65.72 macro F1 on ST2, 34.01 on ST3, and 33.05 on ST1.

Researcher Checklist

  • Pass: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    Detected: Expert Verification

  • Pass: Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Automatic Metrics

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Gap: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Pass: Metric reporting is present

    Detected: accuracy, f1, f1 macro, f1 micro

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.