Skip to content
← Back to explorer

HFEPX Hub

Red Team Papers (Last 60 Days)

Updated from current HFEPX corpus (Mar 1, 2026). 13 papers are grouped in this hub page.

Read Full Context

Updated from current HFEPX corpus (Mar 1, 2026). 13 papers are grouped in this hub page. Common evaluation modes: Automatic Metrics, Simulation Env. Most common rater population: Domain Experts. Common annotation unit: Multi Dim Rubric. Common metric signal: accuracy. Use this page to compare protocol setup, judge behavior, and labeling design decisions before running new eval experiments. Newest paper in this set is from Jan 7, 2026.

Papers: 13 Last published: Jan 7, 2026 Global RSS Tag RSS
Red TeamLast 60d

Researcher Quick Triage

This hub is best used for protocol triage and replication planning from abstract-level evidence. Quality band: Developing .

High-Signal Coverage

100.0%

13 / 13 sampled papers are not low-signal flagged.

Replication-Ready Set

0

Benchmark + metric + eval mode explicitly present.

Judge/Human Comparability

0

Papers containing both `human_eval` and `llm_as_judge`.

  • 0 papers are replication-ready (benchmark + metric + explicit evaluation mode).
  • 0 papers support judge-vs-human agreement analysis.
  • 0 papers report explicit quality controls (calibration/adjudication/IAA).

Primary action: Use this page for scouting only; collect additional papers before attempting replication-critical comparisons.

Why This Matters (Expanded)

Why This Matters For Eval Research

  • 100% of papers report explicit human-feedback signals, led by red-team protocols.
  • automatic metrics appears in 38.5% of papers in this hub.
  • tool-use evaluation appears in 7.7% of papers, indicating agentic evaluation demand.
Protocol Notes (Expanded)

Protocol Takeaways

  • Quality-control reporting is sparse in this slice; prioritize papers with explicit calibration or adjudication steps.
  • Rater context is mostly domain experts, and annotation is commonly multi-dimensional rubrics; use this to scope replication staffing.
  • Track metric sensitivity by reporting both accuracy and jailbreak success rate.

Metric Interpretation

  • accuracy is reported in 15.4% of hub papers (2/13); compare with a secondary metric before ranking methods.
  • jailbreak success rate is reported in 15.4% of hub papers (2/13); compare with a secondary metric before ranking methods.
Researcher Checklist (Expanded)

Researcher Checklist

  • Strong: Papers with explicit human feedback

    Coverage is strong (100% vs 45% target).

  • Gap: Papers reporting quality controls

    Coverage is a replication risk (0% vs 30% target).

  • Gap: Papers naming benchmarks/datasets

    Coverage is a replication risk (0% vs 35% target).

  • Moderate: Papers naming evaluation metrics

    Coverage is usable but incomplete (30.8% vs 35% target).

  • Gap: Papers with known rater population

    Coverage is a replication risk (15.4% vs 35% target).

  • Gap: Papers with known annotation unit

    Coverage is a replication risk (7.7% vs 35% target).

Strengths

  • Strong human-feedback signal (100% of papers).

Known Gaps

  • Only 0% of papers report quality controls; prioritize calibration/adjudication evidence.
  • Rater population is under-specified (15.4% coverage).
  • Annotation unit is under-specified (7.7% coverage).

Suggested Next Analyses

  • Track metric sensitivity by reporting both accuracy and jailbreak success rate.
Recommended Queries (Expanded)

Recommended Queries

Start Here (Best First 6)

Ranked for protocol completeness (human signal, benchmark + metric anchors, quality controls, and judge/human overlap).

Protocol Matrix (Top 12)

Use this to quickly compare protocol ingredients instead of scanning long prose.

Paper HF Signal Eval Modes Benchmarks Metrics QC
Obscure but Effective: Classical Chinese Jailbreak Prompt Optimization via Bio-Inspired Search

Feb 26, 2026

Yes Automatic Metrics Not Reported Accuracy , Conciseness Not Reported
MANATEE: Inference-Time Lightweight Diffusion Based Safety Defense for LLMs

Feb 21, 2026

Yes Automatic Metrics Not Reported Success rate , Jailbreak success rate Not Reported
FENCE: A Financial and Multimodal Jailbreak Detection Dataset

Feb 20, 2026

Yes Automatic Metrics Not Reported Accuracy Not Reported
What Matters For Safety Alignment?

Jan 7, 2026

Yes Automatic Metrics Not Reported Success rate , Jailbreak success rate Not Reported
Assessing Risks of Large Language Models in Mental Health Support: A Framework for Automated Clinical AI Red Teaming

Feb 23, 2026

Yes Simulation Env Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
SibylSense: Adaptive Rubric Learning via Memory Tuning and Adversarial Probing

Feb 24, 2026

Yes Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
A Systematic Review of Algorithmic Red Teaming Methodologies for Assurance and Security of AI Applications

Feb 24, 2026

Yes Automatic Metrics Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
Alignment-Weighted DPO: A principled reasoning approach to improve safety alignment

Feb 24, 2026

Yes Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
IndicJR: A Judge-Free Benchmark of Jailbreak Robustness in South Asian Languages

Feb 18, 2026

Yes Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
Helpful to a Fault: Measuring Illicit Assistance in Multi-Turn, Multilingual LLM Agents

Feb 18, 2026

Yes Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
Intent Laundering: AI Safety Datasets Are Not What They Seem

Feb 17, 2026

Yes Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
Exposing the Systematic Vulnerability of Open-Weight Models to Prefill Attacks

Feb 16, 2026

Yes Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported

Protocol Diff (Top Papers)

Fast side-by-side comparison for the highest-ranked papers in this hub.

Signal Obscure but Effective: Classical Chinese Jailbreak… MANATEE: Inference-Time Lightweight Diffusion Based… FENCE: A Financial and Multimodal Jailbreak Detecti…
Human Feedback Red TeamRed TeamRed Team
Evaluation Modes Automatic MetricsAutomatic MetricsAutomatic Metrics
Benchmarks Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
Metrics Accuracy, ConcisenessSuccess rate, Jailbreak success rateAccuracy
Quality Controls Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
Rater Population UnknownUnknownUnknown
Annotation Unit UnknownUnknownUnknown
Suggested Reading Order (Extended)

This section is intentionally expanded only when needed; use “Start Here” above for a faster pass.

Suggested Reading Order

  1. Obscure but Effective: Classical Chinese Jailbreak Prompt Optimization via Bio-Inspired Search

    Start here for detailed protocol reporting and quality-control evidence. Signals: automatic metrics + red-team protocols. Focus: accuracy. Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used, their security.

  2. Alignment-Weighted DPO: A principled reasoning approach to improve safety alignment

    Start here for detailed protocol reporting and quality-control evidence. Signals: pairwise preferences. Abstract: Recent advances in alignment techniques such as Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback.

  3. A Systematic Review of Algorithmic Red Teaming Methodologies for Assurance and Security of AI Applications

    Start here for detailed protocol reporting and quality-control evidence. Signals: automatic metrics + red-team protocols. Abstract: Cybersecurity threats are becoming increasingly sophisticated, making traditional defense mechanisms and manual.

  4. What Matters For Safety Alignment?

    Include a human-eval paper to calibrate against judge-based evaluation settings. Signals: automatic metrics + red-team protocols. Focus: success rate. Abstract: This paper presents a comprehensive empirical study on.

  5. Assessing Risks of Large Language Models in Mental Health Support: A Framework for Automated Clinical AI Red Teaming

    Include a human-eval paper to calibrate against judge-based evaluation settings. Signals: simulation environments + red-team protocols. Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly utilized for mental health support;.

  6. MANATEE: Inference-Time Lightweight Diffusion Based Safety Defense for LLMs

    Adds automatic metrics with red-team protocols for broader protocol coverage within this hub. Signals: automatic metrics + red-team protocols. Focus: success rate. Abstract: Defending LLMs against adversarial jailbreak.

  7. FENCE: A Financial and Multimodal Jailbreak Detection Dataset

    Adds automatic metrics with red-team protocols for broader protocol coverage within this hub. Signals: automatic metrics + red-team protocols. Focus: accuracy. Abstract: Jailbreaking poses a significant risk to.

  8. SibylSense: Adaptive Rubric Learning via Memory Tuning and Adversarial Probing

    Adds evaluation protocol evidence with rubric ratings for broader protocol coverage within this hub. Signals: rubric ratings. Abstract: Rubrics provide structured, interpretable supervision, but scaling rubric construction is.

Known Limitations

Known Limitations

  • Only 0% of papers report quality controls; prioritize calibration/adjudication evidence.
  • Rater population is under-specified (15.4% coverage).
  • Narrative synthesis is grounded in metadata and abstracts only; full-paper implementation details are not parsed.
Research Utility Snapshot (Detailed)

Research Utility Snapshot

Human Feedback Mix

  • Red Team (13)
  • Pairwise Preference (1)
  • Rubric Rating (1)

Evaluation Modes

  • Automatic Metrics (5)
  • Simulation Env (1)

Top Benchmarks

Top Metrics

  • Accuracy (2)
  • Jailbreak success rate (2)
  • Success rate (2)
  • Conciseness (1)

Rater Population Mix

  • Domain Experts (2)

Quality Controls

Coverage diagnostics (sample-based): human-feedback 100.0% · benchmarks 0.0% · metrics 30.8% · quality controls 0.0%.

Top Papers

Related Hubs

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.