Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Daily Archive

HFEPX Weekly Archive: 2026-W04

Updated from current HFEPX corpus (Feb 27, 2026). 12 papers are grouped in this daily page. Common evaluation modes: Automatic Metrics, Human Eval. Most common rater population: Domain Experts. Common annotation unit: Multi Dim Rubric. Frequent quality control: Calibration. Frequently cited benchmark: DocVQA. Common metric signal: accuracy. Use this page to compare protocol setup, judge behavior, and labeling design decisions before running new eval experiments. Newest paper in this set is from Jan 24, 2026.

Papers: 12 Last published: Jan 24, 2026 Global RSS

Research Narrative

Grounded narrative Model: deterministic-grounded Source: persisted

Updated from current HFEPX corpus (Feb 27, 2026). This page tracks 12 papers for HFEPX Weekly Archive: 2026-W04. Dominant protocol signals include automatic metrics, human evaluation, simulation environments, with frequent benchmark focus on DocVQA, Lawbench and metric focus on accuracy, agreement. Use the grounded sections below to prioritize reproducible protocol choices, benchmark-matched comparisons, and judge-vs-human evaluation checks.

Why This Matters For Eval Research

Protocol Takeaways

Benchmark Interpretation

  • DocVQA appears in 8.3% of hub papers (1/12); use this cohort for benchmark-matched comparisons.
  • Lawbench appears in 8.3% of hub papers (1/12); use this cohort for benchmark-matched comparisons.

Metric Interpretation

  • accuracy is reported in 8.3% of hub papers (1/12); compare with a secondary metric before ranking methods.
  • agreement is reported in 8.3% of hub papers (1/12); compare with a secondary metric before ranking methods.

Researcher Checklist

  • Close gap on Papers with explicit human feedback. Coverage is a replication risk (25% vs 45% target).
  • Close gap on Papers reporting quality controls. Coverage is a replication risk (16.7% vs 30% target).
  • Tighten coverage on Papers naming benchmarks/datasets. Coverage is usable but incomplete (33.3% vs 35% target).
  • Maintain strength on Papers naming evaluation metrics. Coverage is strong (50% vs 35% target).
  • Close gap on Papers with known rater population. Coverage is a replication risk (16.7% vs 35% target).
  • Close gap on Papers with known annotation unit. Coverage is a replication risk (16.7% vs 35% target).

Papers with explicit human feedback

Coverage is a replication risk (25% vs 45% target).

Papers reporting quality controls

Coverage is a replication risk (16.7% vs 30% target).

Papers naming benchmarks/datasets

Coverage is usable but incomplete (33.3% vs 35% target).

Papers naming evaluation metrics

Coverage is strong (50% vs 35% target).

Papers with known rater population

Coverage is a replication risk (16.7% vs 35% target).

Papers with known annotation unit

Coverage is a replication risk (16.7% vs 35% target).

Suggested Reading Order

  1. 1. Decoupling Strategy and Execution in Task-Focused Dialogue via Goal-Oriented Preference Optimization

    Start here for detailed protocol reporting, including rater and quality-control evidence.

  2. 2. Building Safe and Deployable Clinical Natural Language Processing under Temporal Leakage Constraints

    Start here for detailed protocol reporting, including rater and quality-control evidence.

  3. 3. Large Language Models as Automatic Annotators and Annotation Adjudicators for Fine-Grained Opinion Analysis

    Start here for detailed protocol reporting, including rater and quality-control evidence.

  4. 4. RebuttalAgent: Strategic Persuasion in Academic Rebuttal via Theory of Mind

    Include a human-eval paper to anchor calibration against automated judge settings.

  5. 5. PhysE-Inv: A Physics-Encoded Inverse Modeling approach for Arctic Snow Depth Prediction

    Adds automatic metrics for broader coverage within this hub.

  6. 6. Between Search and Platform: ChatGPT Under the DSA

    Adds automatic metrics for broader coverage within this hub.

  7. 7. ErrorMap and ErrorAtlas: Charting the Failure Landscape of Large Language Models

    Adds automatic metrics for broader coverage within this hub.

  8. 8. APEX-Agents

    Adds simulation environments with rubric ratings for broader coverage within this hub.

Known Limitations

  • Only 16.7% of papers report quality controls; prioritize calibration/adjudication evidence.
  • Rater population is under-specified (16.7% coverage).
  • Narrative synthesis is grounded in metadata and abstracts only; full-paper implementation details are not parsed.

Research Utility Links

human_eval vs automatic_metrics

both=0, left_only=2, right_only=8

0 papers use both Human Eval and Automatic Metrics.

automatic_metrics vs simulation_env

both=0, left_only=8, right_only=2

0 papers use both Automatic Metrics and Simulation Env.

human_eval vs simulation_env

both=0, left_only=2, right_only=2

0 papers use both Human Eval and Simulation Env.

Benchmark Brief

DocVQA

Coverage: 1 papers (8.3%)

1 papers (8.3%) mention DocVQA.

Examples: Chain-of-Thought Compression Should Not Be Blind: V-Skip for Efficient Multimodal Reasoning via Dual-Path Anchoring

Benchmark Brief

Lawbench

Coverage: 1 papers (8.3%)

1 papers (8.3%) mention Lawbench.

Examples: Multimodal Multi-Agent Empowered Legal Judgment Prediction

Benchmark Brief

Rebuttalbench

Coverage: 1 papers (8.3%)

1 papers (8.3%) mention Rebuttalbench.

Examples: RebuttalAgent: Strategic Persuasion in Academic Rebuttal via Theory of Mind

Metric Brief

accuracy

Coverage: 1 papers (8.3%)

1 papers (8.3%) mention accuracy.

Examples: Chain-of-Thought Compression Should Not Be Blind: V-Skip for Efficient Multimodal Reasoning via Dual-Path Anchoring

Metric Brief

agreement

Coverage: 1 papers (8.3%)

1 papers (8.3%) mention agreement.

Examples: Large Language Models as Automatic Annotators and Annotation Adjudicators for Fine-Grained Opinion Analysis

Metric Brief

calibration

Coverage: 1 papers (8.3%)

1 papers (8.3%) mention calibration.

Examples: Building Safe and Deployable Clinical Natural Language Processing under Temporal Leakage Constraints

Papers Published On This Date

Recent Daily Archives