Andrew Hundt, Varun Jain, Chia-Hung Lin, Chris Paxton, Gregory D. Hager
Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
A robot can now grasp an object more effectively than ever before, but once it has the object what happens next? We show that a mild relaxation of the task and workspace constraints implicit in existing object grasping datasets can cause neural network based grasping algorithms to fail on even a simple block stacking task when executed under more realistic circumstances. To address this, we introduce the JHU CoSTAR B ...
lock Stacking Dataset (BSD), where a robot interacts with 5.1 cm colored blocks to complete an order-fulfillment style block stacking task. It contains dynamic scenes and real time-series data in a less constrained environment than comparable datasets. There are nearly 12,000 stacking attempts and over 2 million frames of real data. We discuss the ways in which this dataset provides a valuable resource for a broad range of other topics of investigation. We find that hand-designed neural networks that work on prior datasets do not generalize to this task. Thus, to establish a baseline for this dataset, we demonstrate an automated search of neural network based models using a novel multiple-input HyperTree MetaModel, and find a final model which makes reasonable 3D pose predictions for grasping and stacking on our dataset. The CoSTAR BSD, code, and instructions are available at https://sites.google.com/site/costardataset.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
A robot can now grasp an object more effectively than ever before, but once it has the object what happens next?
Only historical official repository was found (jhu-lcsr/costar_plan).
Open jhu-lcsr/costar_planHardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Risk flags
Only a historical official implementation is available.
Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.
Hardware requirements
No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
TensorFlow code for paper "Training Frankenstein's Creature to Stack: HyperTree Architecture Search"
Installable python package for the costar dataset.
No additional community repositories detected yet.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Instruction tuning
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Large Language Models
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.