Urheen/SFPO
alternative
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited
Matched via arXiv identifier search
- Stars
- 3
- Last push
- Apr 15, 2026 (16d ago)
Risk flags
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
Slow-Fast Policy Optimization: Reposition-Before-Update for LLM Reasoning
Ziyan Wang, Zheng Wang, Xingwei Qu, Qi Cheng, Jie Fu, Shengpu Tang, Minjia Zhang, Xiaoming Huo
Published: Oct 5, 2025
No direct implementation yet
Evidence: Inferred
Domain fit: AI-core
Verified repos: 0
Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
Time to first repro: a few days
2 risk flags
Copied
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become central to enhancing reasoning in large language models (LLMs). Yet on-policy algorithms such as Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) often suffer in early training: noisy gradients from low-quality rollouts lead to unstable updates and inefficient exploration. We introduce Slow-Fast Policy Optimization (SFPO), a simple yet efficient framework to address the above limitatio ...
ns via decomposing each step into three stages: a short fast trajectory of inner steps on the same batch, a reposition mechanism to control off-policy drift, and a final slow correction. This reposition-before-update design preserves the objective and rollout process unchanged, making SFPO plug-compatible with existing policy-gradient pipelines. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SFPO consistently improves stability, reduces number of rollouts, and accelerates convergence of reasoning RL training. Specifically, it outperforms GRPO by up to 2.80 points in average on math reasoning benchmarks. It also achieves up to 4.93\texttimes{} fewer rollouts and an up to 4.19\texttimes{} reduction in wall-clock time to match GRPO's best accuracy. Project website is available at https://slow-fast-po.github.io/.
Canonical key: arxiv-2510.04072
Cache status: Fresh
Generated at: Apr 30, 2026, 9:03 PM
Artifact coverage: sparse
HF provider: ok (token)
PWC source used: No
LLM status: not_generated
LLM model: n/a
LLM generated: Unknown
LLM content type: n/a
HF policy: hf-relevance-v27
context only
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
2 risk flags
Results & Benchmarks
Freshness tier: hot
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Reasoning / puzzle solving
MATH
Accuracy
85.40
Source: paper fulltext
Reasoning / puzzle solving
AIME24/25 with Skywork-or1 training
AIME24
25.83
Source: paper fulltext
Benchmark evidence drill-down
2 findings
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source | Evidence refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / puzzle solving | MATH | Accuracy | 85.40 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Reasoning / puzzle solving | AIME24/25 with Skywork-or1 training | AIME24 | 25.83 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become central to enhancing reasoning in large language models (LLMs).
Implementation Evidence Summary
Confidence: low
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Reproduction Risks
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence disclosure
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Implementation Comparison
Top 1 paths
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Implementation Status
No verified maintained repo
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Start from this likely method family: Reinforcement learning.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Reproduction readiness
No Repo
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Apr 30, 2026
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
No verified implementation available
- · No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Additional implementations
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
- Urheen/SFPO Confidence: LowStars: 3
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Research context
Tasks
Reasoning / puzzle solving
Methods
Reinforcement learning
Domains
Natural Language Processing, Large Language Models
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.