Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few hours
1 risk flag
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Instruction tuning
T5-LM
ROUGE-L.
25.7
Source: paper fulltext
Instruction tuning
GPT3
ROUGE-L.
6.8
Source: paper fulltext
Instruction tuning
T 0 0
ROUGE-L.
33.1
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

3 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Instruction tuning T5-LM ROUGE-L. 25.7 paper-derived No explicit refs
Instruction tuning GPT3 ROUGE-L. 6.8 paper-derived No explicit refs
Instruction tuning T 0 0 ROUGE-L. 33.1 paper-derived No explicit refs

Large "instruction-tuned" language models (i.e., finetuned to respond to instructions) have demonstrated a remarkable ability to generalize zero-shot to new tasks.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (Apache-2.0). Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca

Reproduction Risks

  • No CI workflows detected
Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 90/100, grounding 85/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca
best maintained
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
30,252
Last push
Jul 17, 2024 (664d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
yizhongw/self-instruct
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
4,600
Last push
Mar 27, 2023 (1142d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
camel-ai/camel
alternative
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Strong

Community adoption signal (16919 stars)

Stars
16,919
Last push
May 11, 2026 (1d ago)
CIReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match

Best implementation now

tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Code and documentation to train Stanford's Alpaca models, and generate the data.

Stars: 30,252
Forks: 3,995
Last push: Jul 17, 2024
License: Apache-2.0
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Community adoption signal (30252 stars)
License ✓
CI –
Deps ✓
Docker –
  • Selected tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Historical official implementation

Preserved for provenance. Not recommended as the default path for new builds.

yizhongw/self-instruct
Stars: 4,600
Last push: Mar 27, 2023

Reproduction readiness

Setup Required
Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: May 12, 2026

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • · tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • · Last push was 664 days ago — expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • · No Dockerfile — you will set up the environment manually.
  • · No CI pipeline — test coverage is unknown.
Open tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Showing top 6 by score. 2 additional low-confidence matches are hidden.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Research context

Tasks

Instruction tuning

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Natural Language Processing, Large Language Models

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.