Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Securing Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Taxonomy of Attacks, Defenses, and Future Directions

Yuming Xu, Mingtao Zhang, Zhuohan Ge, Haoyang Li, Nicole Hu +5 morePublished Apr 9, 2026
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-core · Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) extends large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge, but this access path also introduces security risks that existing work often conflates with inherent LLM flaws. We frame secure RAG as securing external knowledge access and organize the literature with SLOT, a taxonomy along four axes: the attack Surface (S) where an adversary acts, the defense Layer (L) that controls the same point, the Objective (O) it breaks following the CIA properties, and the Target (T) it pursues, from a single known query (T1) to target-claim manipulation across a query distribution (T2). Mapping attacks, defenses, remediation, and evaluation onto a six-stage knowledge-access pipeline, we expose two structural mismatches. Finally, we discuss directions for more realistic targets, no-blind-spot and adaptively evaluated defenses, stronger confidentiality, and evaluation for multimodal and agentic RAG. The curated paper list for RAG security is in: https://github.com/TreeAI-Lab/Awesome-RAG-Security.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) extends large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge, but this access path also introduces security risks that existing work often conflates with inherent LLM flaws.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.

Reproduction risks
  • Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance
Active
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
0
Last push
Oct 20, 2026 (10d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match
Maintenance
Recently updated
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
0
Last push
Jun 11, 2026 (141d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance
Stale risk
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
0
Last push
Apr 27, 2026 (186d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Oct 29, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Agentic tool use, Retrieval / indexing

Methods

Transformer, Retrieval-augmented generation, Agentic systems

Domains

Natural Language Processing, Large Language Models, AI Agents, Information Retrieval

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers