SCOPE: Tree-based Self-Correcting Online Log Parsing via Syntactic-Semantic Collaboration
Dongyi Fan, Suqiong Zhang, Lili He, Ming Liu, Yifan Huo
Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
Log parsing is a critical step for automated log analysis in complex systems. Traditional heuristic-based methods offer high efficiency but are limited in accuracy due to overlooking semantic context. In contrast, recent LLM-based parsers improve accuracy via se mantic understanding but incur high latency from frequent model calls. To address this, we propose SCOPE, the first self-correcting online log parsing method ...
that integrates the strengths of both heuristic and LLM-based paradigms. SCOPE introduces a novel bi-directional tree structure that enables efficient template match ing from both forward and reverse directions, resulting in a higher overall matching rate. Additionally, it adopts a two-stage syntactic semantic collaboration framework: a lightweight NLP model first utilizes part-of-speech (POS) information for syntax-based match ing, while the LLM is selectively invoked as a fallback to handle semantically complex cases when uncertainty remains. This design significantly reduces LLM API usage while maintaining high ac curacy, achieving a balance between efficiency and effectiveness. Extensive evaluations on diverse benchmark datasets show that SCOPE outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both accuracy and efficiency. The implementation and datasets are publicly released to facilitate further research.
Results & Benchmarks
Benchmark evidence drill-down
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source | Evidence refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural language processing | Qwen3 | w/ CoT | 0.91 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
Log parsing is a critical step for automated log analysis in complex systems.
Implementation Evidence Summary
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Reproduction Risks
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence disclosure
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 75/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Implementation Status
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Reproduction readiness
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
No verified implementation available
- · No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Models
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Research context
Tasks
Natural language processing
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Natural Language Processing, Large Language Models
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.