Reward-Based Online LLM Routing via NeuralUCB
Ming-Hua Tsai, Phat Tran
Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
This study investigates the use of NeuralUCB for cost-aware large language model (LLM) routing. Existing routing approaches can be broadly grouped into supervised routing methods and partial-feedback methods, each with different tradeoffs in efficiency and adaptivity. We implement a NeuralUCB-based routing policy and evaluate it on RouterBench under a simulated online setting. Experimental results show that the propo ...
sed method consistently outperforms random and min-cost baselines in utility reward. Compared with the max-quality reference, our method achieves substantially lower inference cost while maintaining competitive reward. These findings suggest that NeuralUCB is a promising approach for cost-aware LLM routing, while also highlighting remaining challenges in action discrimination and exploration.
Results & Benchmarks
Some benchmark signal exists in the extracted evidence, but it is not structured strongly enough yet for a confident benchmark decision.
Benchmark signal from claims
- Across the simulated online evaluation on RouterBench, NeuralUCB consistently outperforms random and min-cost routing baselines and also RouteLLM-BERT in terms of utility reward.
This study investigates the use of NeuralUCB for cost-aware large language model (LLM) routing.
Implementation Evidence Summary
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Reproduction Risks
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence disclosure
LLM evidence refs: paper.abstract, evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_7], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_4], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_5], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_toc_2], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_11], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_12], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_6], researcherSummary.reproductionRisks[0], researcherSummary.reproductionRisks[1], researcherSummary.reproductionRisks[2], guidance.riskFlags[0], guidance.riskFlags[1], guidance.timeToFirstRepro, researcherSummary.timeToFirstMeaningfulRun, researcherSummary.hardwareNotes[0]
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation Status
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Reproduction readiness
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
No verified implementation available
- · No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Datasets
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Research context
Tasks
None detected
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Natural Language Processing, Large Language Models
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.