Matched via arXiv identifier search
- Stars
- 0
- Last push
- Jun 15, 2026 (3d ago)
Risk flags
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
- Low confidence match
Xiaojie Gu, Dmitry Ignatov, Radu Timofte
Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
Neural Architecture Search (NAS) automates network design, but conventional methods demand substantial computational resources. We propose a closed-loop pipeline leveraging large language models (LLMs) to iteratively generate, evaluate, and refine convolutional neural network architectures for image classification on a single consumer-grade GPU without LLM fine-tuning. Central to our approach is a historical feedback ...
memory inspired by Markov chains: a sliding window of $K{=}5$ recent improvement attempts keeps context size constant while providing sufficient signal for iterative learning. Unlike prior LLM optimizers that discard failure trajectories, each history entry is a structured diagnostic triple -- recording the identified problem, suggested modification, and resulting outcome -- treating code execution failures as first-class learning signals. A dual-LLM specialization reduces per-call cognitive load: a Code Generator produces executable PyTorch architectures while a Prompt Improver handles diagnostic reasoning. Since both the LLM and architecture training share limited VRAM, the search implicitly favors compact, hardware-efficient models suited to edge deployment. We evaluate three frozen instruction-tuned LLMs (${\leq}7$B parameters) across up to 2000 iterations in an unconstrained open code space, using one-epoch proxy accuracy on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNette as a fast ranking signal. On CIFAR-10, DeepSeek-Coder-6.7B improves from 28.2% to 69.2%, Qwen2.5-7B from 50.0% to 71.5%, and GLM-5 from 43.2% to 62.0%. A full 2000-iteration search completes in ${\approx}18$ GPU hours on a single RTX~4090, establishing a low-budget, reproducible, and hardware-aware paradigm for LLM-driven NAS without cloud infrastructure.
Some benchmark signal exists in the extracted evidence, but it is not structured strongly enough yet for a confident benchmark decision.
Neural Architecture Search (NAS) automates network design, but conventional methods demand substantial computational resources.
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Hardware Notes
A full 2000-iteration search completes in ${\approx}18$ GPU hours on a single RTX~4090, establishing a low-budget, reproducible, and hardware-aware paradigm for LLM-driven NAS with
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
Hardware requirements
No verified implementation available
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Image classification, Instruction tuning
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Computer vision, Natural Language Processing, Large Language Models
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.