Propensity Straight-Through Gradients for Discrete Stochastic Systems
Abstract
Domain fit: Niche / domain-specific · No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.
Continuous-time Markov chains (CTMCs) provide the backbone for modeling discrete stochastic dynamics across applied, physical, and biological sciences. Their integration with modern gradient-based machine learning, however, is limited by the hard categorical event selection intrinsic to Gillespie-type simulation algorithms. We exploit the affine state update to obtain the exact one-step conditional-mean sensitivity by differentiating normalized reaction propensities. We pair this backward rule with exact forward trajectories to define the propensity straight-through (PST) estimator. At the trajectory level, we show that one-step sensitivities composed across events can depart from the exact multistep sensitivity. We derive the resulting per-step discrepancy in closed form and prove that it vanishes identically for affine downstream dependence. PST matches the accuracy of Gumbel-Softmax straight-through across all benchmarks: reversible dimerization (0.06% error), a genetic oscillator (1.7% error), a 50-task repressilator suite (0.17% median error), and patch-clamp ion-channel recordings ($R^2$ = 0.988). Under matched settings, PST converges 3.0-fold faster on the oscillator and 2.1-fold faster on the ion channel. At deep-learning scale, PST trains a 203,796-parameter stochastic reaction network with hard sampling, reaching 98.22% MNIST digit classification accuracy. By differentiating an exact conditional mean rather than a relaxed sample, PST offers a temperature- and Gumbel-free path to scalable gradient-based learning through exact stochastic trajectories.
Results and benchmarks
Continuous-time Markov chains (CTMCs) provide the backbone for modeling discrete stochastic dynamics across applied, physical, and biological sciences.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 80/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Repositories and ecosystem
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
- CTMCDL/PST
Confidence: Medium · 1 stars
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Models
Datasets
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Tasks
Scientific computing
Methods
None detected
Domains
None detected
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.