Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimization

Published Jun 1, 2023
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimization focuses on instruction tuning.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Instruction tuning LLaMA-7B 0-shot (log-likelihood) Precision 70.23 paper-derived
Instruction tuning LLaMA-30B 0-shot (log-likelihood) Precision 56.48 paper-derived
Instruction tuning PandaLM-7B (with only eval label) Accuracy 0.4725 paper-derived
Instruction tuning PandaLM-7B Accuracy 0.5926 paper-derived
Instruction tuning ARC Accuracy 25 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)

Why this implementation
Confidence: low

baaivision/judgelm is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Partial overlap with paper title keywords). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 441 GitHub stars.

Open weopenml/pandalm
Reproduction risks
  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.
  • Only historical official repository was found: weopenml/pandalm.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

weopenml/pandalm
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
926
Last push
May 22, 2024 (825d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
VyetGokyra/awaresome_LLM_eval_benchmark
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
8
Last push
Aug 12, 2025 (379d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
kee0812/pandalm-webapp
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
0
Last push
Jun 13, 2024 (803d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Partial overlap with paper title keywords

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 25, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • weopenml/pandalm has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • Last push was 825 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
  • No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.
Open weopenml/pandalm

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/weopenml/pandalm.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Repositories and ecosystem

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

  • baaivision/judgelm Adjacent · Confidence: Low · 441 stars

    Partial overlap with paper title keywords

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Instruction tuning

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Large Language Models

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Instruction tuning Transformer Large Language Models

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).