Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few hours
2 risk flags
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Natural language processing
MATH
Accuracy on MATH testset.
93.74
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

1 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Natural language processing MATH Accuracy on MATH testset. 93.74 paper-derived No explicit refs

MARIO Eval: Evaluate Your Math LLM with your Math LLM--A mathematical dataset evaluation toolkit is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

mario-math-reasoning/math_evaluation is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open mario-math-reasoning/math_evaluation

Reproduction Risks

  • License metadata missing
  • No CI workflows detected
Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.

Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 95/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
52
Last push
Mar 5, 2025 (472d ago)
ReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup
microsoft/rstar
alternative
Maintenance: Stale risk
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Community adoption signal (1421 stars)

Stars
1,421
Last push
Sep 12, 2025 (281d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (340 stars)

Stars
340
Last push
Jun 5, 2025 (380d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

mario-math-reasoning/math_evaluation
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

MARIO-Math-Reasoning/MARIO_EVAL

Stars: 52
Forks: 4
Last push: Mar 5, 2025
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (52 stars)
License –
CI –
Deps ✓
Docker –
  • Selected mario-math-reasoning/math_evaluation as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Setup Required
Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Jun 19, 2026

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • · mario-math-reasoning/math_evaluation has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • · Last push was 472 days ago — expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • · No Dockerfile — you will set up the environment manually.
  • · No CI pipeline — test coverage is unknown.
Open mario-math-reasoning/math_evaluation

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/mario-math-reasoning/math_evaluation.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

Datasets

Spaces

No trustworthy demo spaces right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

Natural language processing

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Large Language Models

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.