Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
2 risk flags
tf

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Retrieval / indexing
WebQuestions
BM25
20.8
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

1 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Retrieval / indexing WebQuestions BM25 20.8 paper-derived No explicit refs

Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answering focuses on retrieval / indexing.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

google-research/language is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (Apache-2.0).

Open google-research/language

Reproduction Risks

  • No CI workflows detected
  • Dependency manifest is missing

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.

Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 95/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

google-research/language
best maintained
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Partial overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
1,774
Last push
May 5, 2026 (2d ago)

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (267 stars)

Stars
267
Last push
Apr 15, 2026 (22d ago)

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (31 stars)

Stars
31
Last push
Jun 26, 2022 (1411d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

google-research/language
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Shared repository for open-sourced projects from the Google AI Language team.

Stars: 1,774
Forks: 362
Last push: May 5, 2026
License: Apache-2.0
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Partial overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (1774 stars)
License ✓
CI –
Deps –
Docker –
  • Selected google-research/language as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: May 7, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · google-research/language has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
Open google-research/language

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Datasets

No trustworthy dataset matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face

Spaces

No trustworthy demo spaces right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

Retrieval / indexing

Methods

Retrieval-augmented generation

Domains

Information Retrieval

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.