KRONE: Scalable LLM-Augmented Log Anomaly Detection via Hierarchical Abstraction
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Log anomaly detection is crucial for uncovering system failures and security risks. Although logs originate from nested component executions with clear boundaries, this structure is lost when stored as flat sequences. As a result, state-of-the-art methods often miss true dependencies within executions while learning spurious correlations across unrelated events. We propose KRONE, the first hierarchical anomaly detection framework that automatically derives execution hierarchies from flat logs to enable modular, multi-level anomaly detection. At its core, the KRONE Log Abstraction Model extracts application-specific semantic hierarchies, which are used to recursively decompose log sequences into coherent execution units, referred to as KRONE Seqs. This transforms sequence-level detection into a set of modular KRONE Seq-level detection tasks. For each test KRONE Seq, KRONE adopts a hybrid modular detection strategy that routes between an efficient level-independent Local-Context detector for rapid filtering and a Nested-Aware detector that captures cross-level semantic dependencies, augmented with LLM-based anomaly detection and explanation. KRONE further optimizes detection through cached result reuse and early-exit strategies along the hierarchy. Experiments on three public benchmarks and one industrial dataset from ByteDance Cloud demonstrate that KRONE achieves substantial improvements in accuracy (42.49% to 87.98%), F1 score, data efficiency (117.3x reduction), resource efficiency (43.7x reduction), and interpretability. KRONE improves F1-score by 10.07% (82.76% to 92.83%) over prior methods while reducing LLM usage to only 1.1% to 3.3% of the test data. Code: https://github.com/LeiMa0324/KRONE Demo: https://leima0324.github.io/KRONE_Demo_official/
Results and benchmarks
Log anomaly detection is crucial for uncovering system failures and security risks.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Detection | HDFS | Recall | 99.98 | paper-derived |
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Repositories and ecosystem
Official
No additional official repositories detected.
Community
- LeiMa0324/Krone_officialConfidence: Medium
KRONE: Hierarchical and Modular Log Anomaly Detection. (ICDE 26)
5 stars · 0 forks · Last push Apr 30, 2026
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Models
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Tasks
Natural language processing, Detection
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Large Language Models
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.