Know Your Needs Better: Towards Structured Understanding of Marketer Demands with Analogical Reasoning Augmented LLMs
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-core · Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
In this paper, we explore a new way for user targeting, where non-expert marketers could select their target users solely given demands in natural language form. The key to this issue is how to transform natural languages into practical structured logical languages, i.e., the structured understanding of marketer demands. In practical scenarios, the demands of non-expert marketers are often abstract and diverse. Considering the impressive natural language processing ability of large language models (LLMs), we try to leverage LLMs to solve this issue. To stimulate the LLMs' reasoning ability, the chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting method is widely used, but existing methods still have some limitations in our scenario: (1) Previous methods either use simple "Let's think step by step" spells or provide fixed examples in demonstrations without considering compatibility between prompts and concrete questions, making LLMs ineffective when the marketers' demands are abstract and diverse. (2) Previous methods are often implemented in closed-source models or excessively large models, which is not suitable in industrial practical scenarios. Based on these, we propose ARALLM (i.e., Analogical Reasoning Augmented Large Language Models) consisting of two modules: Analogical Reasoning based Prompting and Reasoning-Augmented Multi-Task Model Distillation. Then, we adopt a retrieval-based method to conduct analogical reasoning with the help of the reasoning library. The experimental results show that this prompting strategy achieves better performance than the ordinary prompting method. Beyond that, we distill knowledge from super LLMs (GPT-3.5) to fine-tune smaller student LLMs in a multi-task training paradigm, enabling the models to be easily deployed in practical environments. Part of our data and code can be found at https://github.com/alipay/Analogic-Reasoning-Augmented-Large-Language-Model.
Results and benchmarks
In this paper, we explore a new way for user targeting, where non-expert marketers could select their target users solely given demands in natural language form.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Start from related paper: Discussion on Induction and Deduction in Science Inquiry.
- Start from this likely method family: Leverage (statistics).
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
4
Citations
15
References
Tasks
Computer science, Natural language, Task (project management), Deductive reasoning, Automated reasoning, Logical reasoning, Physical Sciences
Methods
Leverage (statistics)
Domains
Artificial intelligence
Related papers
- Discussion on Induction and Deduction in Science InquirySearch on Paper2Code
2006 · Semantic similarity
- Discussion of Analogy ReasoningSearch on Paper2Code
2003 · Semantic similarity
- The capacity to generate alternative ideas is more important than inhibition for logical reasoning in preschool-age childrenSearch on Paper2Code
2016 · Semantic similarity
- Identifying Kinds of Reasoning in Collective ArgumentationSearch on Paper2Code
2014 · Semantic similarity
- The Benefits and Limits of Social Interaction: The Case of Mathematical ProofSearch on Paper2Code
1991 · Semantic similarity
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.