Matched via arXiv identifier search
- Stars
- 0
- Last push
- May 9, 2026 (40d ago)
Risk flags
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
Zhongping Ji
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Orthogonal feature decorrelation is effective for low-bit online vector quantization, but dense random orthogonal transforms incur prohibitive $O(d^2)$ storage and compute. RotorQuant reduces this cost with blockwise $3$D Clifford rotors, yet the resulting $3$D partition is poorly aligned with modern hardware and offers limited local mixing. We propose \textbf{IsoQuant}, a blockwise rotation framework based on quater ...
nion algebra and the isoclinic decomposition of $SO(4)$. It represents each $4$D block as a quaternion and applies a closed-form transform $T(v)=q_L v \overline{q_R}$. This yields two main variants: \emph{IsoQuant-Full}, which realizes the full $SO(4)$ rotation, and \emph{IsoQuant-Fast}, which keeps only one isoclinic factor for lower cost; the framework also admits a lightweight $2$D special case. At $d=128$, IsoQuant-Full reduces forward rotation cost from about $2{,}408$ FMAs in RotorQuant to $1{,}024$, while IsoQuant-Fast further reduces it to $512$. Across $18$ fused CUDA settings with $d \in {128,256,512}$, bit widths ${2,3,4}$, and FP16/FP32 execution, IsoQuant achieves mean kernel-level speedups of about $4.5\times$--$4.7\times$ over RotorQuant while maintaining comparable reconstruction MSE, with peak speedups above $6\times$. Current validation is limited to the stage-1 quantize--dequantize path on synthetic normalized vectors; end-to-end KV-cache evaluation remains future work.
Some benchmark signal exists in the extracted evidence, but it is not structured strongly enough yet for a confident benchmark decision.
Orthogonal feature decorrelation is effective for low-bit online vector quantization, but dense random orthogonal transforms incur prohibitive $O(d^2)$ storage and compute.
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Hardware Notes
Across $18$ fused CUDA settings with $d \in {128,256,512}$, bit widths ${2,3,4}$, and FP16/FP32 execution, IsoQuant achieves mean kernel-level speedups of about $4.5\times$--$4.7\t
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (39 stars)
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
Hardware requirements
No verified implementation available
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Quantization
Methods
Quantization
Domains
Large Language Models
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.