Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
2 risk flags
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Retrieval / indexing
COCO
R @ ​ 5 @5 @ 5
23.92
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

1 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Retrieval / indexing COCO R @ ​ 5 @5 @ 5 23.92 paper-derived No explicit refs

iSEARLE: Improving Textual Inversion for Zero-Shot Composed Image Retrieval focuses on retrieval / indexing.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: medium

miccunifi/searle is the best available implementation candidate based on ranking signals, but recommendation confidence is not yet high. License is declared (NOASSERTION).

Open miccunifi/searle

Reproduction Risks

  • No CI workflows detected
  • Dependency manifest is missing

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.

Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 95/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

miccunifi/circo
historical official
Maintenance: Stale risk
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
87
Last push
Aug 6, 2025 (318d ago)

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
miccunifi/searle
best maintained
Maintenance: Stale risk
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Limited

Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
198
Last push
Jul 31, 2025 (324d ago)
Releases

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
miccunifi/SEARLE
alternative
Maintenance: Stale risk
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
198
Last push
Jul 31, 2025 (324d ago)
Releases

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing

Best implementation now

miccunifi/searle
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Limited

[ICCV 2023] - Zero-shot Composed Image Retrieval with Textual Inversion

Stars: 198
Forks: 11
Last push: Jul 31, 2025
License: NOASSERTION
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (198 stars)
License ✓
CI –
Deps –
Docker –
  • Selected miccunifi/searle as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Historical official implementation

Preserved for provenance. Not recommended as the default path for new builds.

miccunifi/circo
Stars: 87
Last push: Aug 6, 2025

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 15, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · miccunifi/searle has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 324 days ago.
Open miccunifi/searle

Additional implementations

Official

No additional official repositories detected.

Community

  • miccunifi/SEARLE
    Confidence: Medium

    [ICCV 2023] - Zero-shot Composed Image Retrieval with Textual Inversion

    Stars: 198
    Last push: Jul 31, 2025
    License: NOASSERTION

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Research context

Tasks

Retrieval / indexing

Methods

Retrieval-augmented generation

Domains

Computer vision, Information Retrieval

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Retrieval / indexing Retrieval-augmented generation Computer vision Information Retrieval

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.

Post a Job Get a Quote