Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

InstructCoder: Instruction Tuning Large Language Models for Code Editing

Published Oct 1, 2023
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
InstructCoder: Instruction Tuning Large Language Models for Code Editing focuses on instruction tuning.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Instruction tuning ChatGPT (gpt-3.5-turbo-0613) Accuracy . 57.73 paper-derived
Instruction tuning GPT-4 (gpt-4-0613) Accuracy . 68.56 paper-derived
Instruction tuning GPT-4 Turbo (gpt-4-1106-preview) Accuracy . 66.49 paper-derived
Instruction tuning BLOOM Accuracy 0.52 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

InstructCoder: Instruction Tuning Large Language Models for Code Editing | Oral ACL-2024 srw

66 stars · 6 forks · Last push Oct 4, 2024 · MIT license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

qishenghu/CodeInstruct is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (MIT). Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open qishenghu/CodeInstruct
Reproduction risks
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Selected qishenghu/CodeInstruct as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

qishenghu/CodeInstruct
best maintained
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
66
Last push
Oct 4, 2024 (690d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
66
Last push
Oct 4, 2024 (690d)

Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (66 stars)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
66
Last push
Oct 4, 2024 (690d)

Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (66 stars)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 22, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • qishenghu/CodeInstruct has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • Last push was 690 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
  • No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.
Open qishenghu/CodeInstruct

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/qishenghu/CodeInstruct.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Research context

Tasks

Instruction tuning

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Natural Language Processing, Large Language Models

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).