Faster LLM Inference via Sequential Monte Carlo
Yahya Emara, Mauricio Barba da Costa, Chi-Chih Chang, Cameron Freer, Tim Vieira, Ryan Cotterell, Mohamed S. Abdelfattah
Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
Speculative decoding (SD) accelerates language model inference by drafting tokens from a cheap proposal model and verifying them against an expensive target model via rejection sampling. Because rejection truncates the draft block at the first error, throughput degrades when draft and target diverge. Rather than rejecting draft tokens outright, we propose to reweight them. To this end, we introduce sequential Monte C ...
arlo speculative decoding (SMC-SD), which replaces token-level rejection with importance-weighted resampling over a population of draft particles. SMC-SD is a principled approximate inference scheme that trades exactness for additional speed, while preserving theoretical bounds on its per-step approximation error. Because LLM inference is memory bandwidth-bound, the arithmetic needed to draft particles and to score them in parallel comes nearly for free -- SMC-SD uses idle compute to turn verification into a vectorized, fixed-size operation with no rollback. Empirically, SMC-SD achieves 2.36x speed-up over speculative decoding and a 5.2x speed-up over autoregressive decoding, while remaining within 3% of the target model's accuracy on reasoning, instruction-following, and coding benchmarks.
Results & Benchmarks
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Speculative decoding (SD) accelerates language model inference by drafting tokens from a cheap proposal model and verifying them against an expensive target model via rejection sampling.
Implementation Evidence Summary
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Reproduction Risks
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence disclosure
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 2 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Implementation Status
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Reproduction readiness
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
No verified implementation available
- · No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
Hugging Face artifacts
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
Models
- deepseek-ai/deepseek-llm-7b-chat Curated RelatedDownloads: 34,624Likes: 226
- deepseek-ai/deepseek-llm-7b-base Curated RelatedDownloads: 45,592Likes: 145
- BAAI/llm-embedder Curated RelatedDownloads: 17,622Likes: 128
Broaden model search
Datasets
No trustworthy dataset matches right now.
Search datasets on Hugging FaceSpaces
No trustworthy demo spaces right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceResearch context
Tasks
Instruction tuning
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Natural Language Processing, Large Language Models
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.