Zehao Wang, Huaide Jiang, Shuaiwu Dong, Yuping Wang, Hang Qiu, Jiachen Li
Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
Human driving behavior is inherently personal, which is shaped by long-term habits and influenced by short-term intentions. Individuals differ in how they accelerate, brake, merge, yield, and overtake across diverse situations. However, existing end-to-end autonomous driving systems either optimize for generic objectives or rely on fixed driving modes, lacking the ability to adapt to individual preferences or interpr ...
et natural language intent. To address this gap, we propose Drive My Way (DMW), a personalized Vision-Language-Action (VLA) driving framework that aligns with users' long-term driving habits and adapts to real-time user instructions. DMW learns a user embedding from our personalized driving dataset collected across multiple real drivers and conditions the policy on this embedding during planning, while natural language instructions provide additional short-term guidance. Closed-loop evaluation on the Bench2Drive benchmark demonstrates that DMW improves style instruction adaptation, and user studies show that its generated behaviors are recognizable as each driver's own style, highlighting personalization as a key capability for human-centered autonomous driving. Our data and code are available at https://dmw-cvpr.github.io/.
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source | Evidence refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction tuning | SimLingo | Efficiency | 247.60 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
Human driving behavior is inherently personal, which is shaped by long-term habits and influenced by short-term intentions.
Thinklab-SJTU/Awesome-LLM4AD is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Matches contextual method/domain keyword: autonomous driving). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 1783 GitHub stars.
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
LLM evidence refs: paper.abstract, evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_3], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_table_1], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_4], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_15], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_toc_7], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_table_3], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_23], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_14], researcherSummary.implementationRecommendation, guidance.riskFlags[0], researcherSummary.benchmarkSnapshot[0], paper.title, summary.hasReliableImplementation
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 85/100, status high.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
Hardware requirements
No verified implementation available
These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.
Matches contextual method/domain keyword: autonomous driving
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Instruction tuning, Autonomous driving
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Computer vision, Large Language Models, Autonomous Driving
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.