Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

CTG-DB: An Ontology-Based Transformation of ClinicalTrials.gov to Enable Cross-Trial Drug Safety Analyses

Jeffery L. Painter, François Haguinet, Andrew BatePublished Mar 16, 2026
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: Niche / domain-specific · No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.

ClinicalTrials .gov (CT .gov) is the largest publicly accessible registry of clinical studies, yet its registry-oriented architecture and heterogeneous adverse event (AE) terminology limit systematic pharmacovigilance (PV) analytics. AEs are typically recorded as investigator-reported text rather than standardized identifiers, requiring manual reconciliation to identify coherent safety concepts. We present the ClinicalTrials .gov Transformation Database (CTG-DB), an open-source pipeline that ingests the complete CT .gov XML archive and produces a relational database aligned to standardized AE terminology using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). CTG-DB preserves arm-level denominators, represents placebo and comparator arms, and normalizes AE terminology using deterministic exact and fuzzy matching to ensure transparent and reproducible mappings. This framework enables concept-level retrieval and cross-trial aggregation for scalable placebo-referenced safety analyses and integration of clinical trial evidence into downstream PV signal detection.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: warm
ClinicalTrials .gov (CT .gov) is the largest publicly accessible registry of clinical studies, yet its registry-oriented architecture and heterogeneous adverse event (AE) terminology limit systematic pharmacovigilance (PV) analytics.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.

Reproduction risks
  • Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 26, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Retrieval / indexing

Methods

Retrieval-augmented generation

Domains

Information Retrieval

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.