CORE: Improving Compositional Reasoning in MLLM Embedding via Reranker Distillation
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
MLLM-based embedding models remain limited in compositional retrieval, often failing to distinguish scenes containing the same concepts but different attribute-object bindings. Yet the same backbone can resolve such distinctions when used as a cross-attentive reranker, motivating us to distill its compositional judgments into the embedding model. We propose CORE, which synthesizes candidate lists spanning five compositional matching levels and introduces a Rank-KL objective that trains the embedding model to reproduce the reranker's fine-grained ranking. We further introduce a graded evaluation protocol and compare contrastive learning, pairwise CoSENT, and listwise Rank-KL under the same data and tuning budget. Our comparison shows that both CoSENT and Rank-KL use the multi-level supervision more effectively than contrastive learning, with Rank-KL achieving the strongest overall performance. Across three compositional reasoning benchmarks (COLA, SUGARCREPE++, NEGBENCH), CORE-RERANKER-8B achieves an 82.7% total average, outperforming Jina-Reranker by 10.7 points, while CORE-EMBED-8B achieves the best total average (0.666) among all evaluated embedding models. The improvements transfer to the MCMR benchmark without sacrificing retrieval performance on COCO and Flickr30K.
Results and benchmarks
MLLM-based embedding models remain limited in compositional retrieval, often failing to distinguish scenes containing the same concepts but different attribute-object bindings.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retrieval | COCO | MRR | 5 | paper-derived |
| Retrieval | MCMR | MRR | 5 | paper-derived |
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.
LLM evidence refs: paper.title, summary.hasReliableImplementation, guidance.mode
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 2 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 78/100, status high.
Implementation
No direct paper-linked artifacts found; showing strongest related artifacts
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days · Best available artifact: Alibaba-NLP/core-reranker-2b
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Hugging Face artifacts
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
Models
- Alibaba-NLP/core-reranker-2b
133 downloads · 2 likes
- Alibaba-NLP/core-reranker-8b
93 downloads · 1 likes
Broaden model search
Datasets
No trustworthy datasets matches right now.
Search datasets on Hugging FaceSpaces
No trustworthy spaces matches right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceResearch context
Tasks
Retrieval / indexing
Methods
Transformer, Retrieval-augmented generation
Domains
Information Retrieval
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
LLM evidence refs: paper.title, summary.hasReliableImplementation, guidance.mode