Comparison of methods for the calculation of the real dilogarithm regarding instruction-level parallelism
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-core · Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
We compare different methods for the computation of the real dilogarithm regarding their ability for using instruction-level parallelism when executed on appropriate CPUs. As a result we present an instruction-level-aware method and compare it to existing implementations.
Results and benchmarks
We compare different methods for the computation of the real dilogarithm regarding their ability for using instruction-level parallelism when executed on appropriate CPUs.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.
Implementation
Best maintained implementation now
Implementation of polylogarithms in C/C++/Fortran
37 stars · 5 forks · Last push Aug 6, 2025 · MIT license
- License
- CI
- Dependencies
- Docker
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Matched via arXiv identifier search
Expander/polylogarithm is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (MIT).
Open Expander/polylogarithm- Dependency manifest is missing
- Selected Expander/polylogarithm as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
- Includes CI workflow signals.
- Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
- Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.
Compare implementation paths
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 37
- Last push
- Aug 6, 2025 (385d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No push in 12+ months
- No Docker setup
- Dependency manifest missing
- Maintenance
- Recently updated
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 12
- Last push
- Apr 15, 2026 (133d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No Docker setup
- Dependency manifest missing
- Maintenance
- Recently updated
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 4
- Last push
- May 11, 2026 (108d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No Docker setup
- Dependency manifest missing
Reproduction readiness
Major work
No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required
- Expander/polylogarithm has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
- You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
- Last push was 385 days ago.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Repositories and ecosystem
Official
- expander/polylogConfidence: High
Rust implementation of polylogarithms.
4 stars · 0 forks · Last push May 11, 2026
Community
No additional community repositories detected yet.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Tasks
Instruction tuning
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Large Language Models
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).