Comparing Human Role-Players and LLM-Simulated Clients in Online Counselling Training: An Analysis of Counselling Patterns
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
This study investigates the capabilities of Large Language Models to simulate counselling clients in educational role-plays in comparison to human role-players. Initially, we recorded role-playing sessions, where novice counsellors interacted with human peers acting as clients, followed by role-plays between humans and clients simulated by Mistrals Mixtral 8x7b using 4-bit quantization. These interactions were analysed with a counselling communication pattern system at sentence level. We investigated two key questions: (1) to what extent LLM-generated responses replicate authentic conversational dynamics and (2) whether counsellors' communication behaviour differs when interacting with human versus LLM-simulated clients. The findings highlight both similarities and differences in the application of counselling patterns across scenarios, showing the potential of LLM-based role-playing exercises to enhance counselling competencies and to identify areas for further refinement in virtual client simulations.
Results and benchmarks
This study investigates the capabilities of Large Language Models to simulate counselling clients in educational role-plays in comparison to human role-players.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Start from related paper: Do Artificial Intelligence Clients Speak Like Human Clients? Exploring GPT‐4's Content‐Level Performance in Counseling Role‐Play.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
0
Citations
0
References
Tasks
Psychology, Applied psychology, Key (lock), Replicate, Virtual actor, Computer-mediated communication, Dynamics (music), Sentence
Methods
large language models
Domains
Medical education
Related papers
- Do Artificial Intelligence Clients Speak Like Human Clients? Exploring GPT‐4's Content‐Level Performance in Counseling Role‐PlaySearch on Paper2Code
2025 · Semantic similarity
- PsyCLIENT: Client Simulation via Conversational Trajectory Modeling for Trainee Practice and Model Evaluation in Mental Health CounselingSearch on Paper2Code
2026 · Semantic similarity
- Evaluating Role-Consistency in LLMs for Counselor TrainingSearch on Paper2Code
2026 · Semantic similarity
- Can LLM Agents Really Simulate Clients in Counseling?Search on Paper2Code
2026 · Semantic similarity
- A qualitative content analysis of ChatGPT 's client simulation role‐play for practising counselling skillsSearch on Paper2Code
2023 · Semantic similarity
- Artificial Clients, Genuine Interactions? Assessing ChatGPT4's Process‐Level Performance in Clinical Simulations Using Qualitative Content AnalysisSearch on Paper2Code
2025 · Semantic similarity
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.