Matched via arXiv identifier search
- Stars
- 2
- Last push
- May 12, 2026 (37d ago)
Risk flags
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
Na Min An, Inha Kang, Minhyun Lee, Hyunjung Shim
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Vision-Language Encoders (VLEs) are widely adopted as the backbone of zero-shot referring image segmentation (RIS), enabling text-guided localization without task-specific training. However, prior works underexplored the underlying biases within mid-layer representations that preserve positional and language-specific information. Through layer-wise investigation, we reveal that the conventionally used final-layer mul ...
timodal embeddings prioritize global semantic alignment, leading to two coupled consequences. First, vision embeddings exhibit weak sensitivity to positional cues. Second, multilingual text embeddings form language-dependent geometric shifts within the shared space. Motivated by these findings, we identify an underexplored pathway within VLE mid-layers to construct a spatial map, applicable for improving zero-shot RIS by 1-7 mIoU on nine RefCOCO benchmarks. Furthermore, leveraging mixed-language mid-layer embeddings yields enhanced spatial grounding accuracy (+7-8 mIoU and IoU@50), albeit with increased inference cost, and also improves performance on the zero-shot text-to-image retrieval task. Our work opens up the discussion about the effects of effective representational bias probing of VLEs for enhanced spatial grounding.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Vision-Language Encoders (VLEs) are widely adopted as the backbone of zero-shot referring image segmentation (RIS), enabling text-guided localization without task-specific training.
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
Hardware requirements
No verified implementation available
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Retrieval / indexing
Methods
Transformer, Retrieval-augmented generation
Domains
Computer vision, Information Retrieval
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.