Matched via arXiv identifier search
- Stars
- 0
- Last push
- Jun 8, 2026 (10d ago)
Risk flags
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
- Low confidence match
Yichi Zhu, Kan Ling, Xu Liu, Hengrun Zhang, Huiqun Yu, Guisheng Fan
Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
Medication errors pose a significant threat to patient safety, making pharmacist verification (PV) a critical, yet heavily burdened, final safeguard. The direct application of Large Language Models (LLMs) to this zero-tolerance domain is untenable due to their inherent factual unreliability, lack of traceability, and weakness in complex reasoning. To address these challenges, we introduce PharmGraph-Auditor, a novel ...
system designed for safe and evidence-grounded prescription auditing. The core of our system is a trustworthy Hybrid Pharmaceutical Knowledge Base (HPKB), implemented under the Virtual Knowledge Graph (VKG) paradigm. This architecture strategically unifies a relational component for set constraint satisfaction and a graph component for topological reasoning via a rigorous mapping layer. To construct this HPKB, we propose the Iterative Schema Refinement (ISR) algorithm, a framework that enables the co-evolution of both graph and relational schemas from medical texts. For auditing, we introduce the KB-grounded Chain of Verification (CoV), a new reasoning paradigm that transforms the LLM from an unreliable generator into a transparent reasoning engine. CoV decomposes the audit task into a sequence of verifiable queries against the HPKB, generating hybrid query plans to retrieve evidence from the most appropriate data store. Experimental results demonstrate robust knowledge extraction capabilities and show promises of using PharmGraph-Auditor to enable pharmacists to achieve safer and faster prescription verification.
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source | Evidence refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural language processing | Experience Review (Human) | Precision | 100.0 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Natural language processing | Rule Review (CDSS) | Recall | 67.6 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Natural language processing | Proposed Method (Ours) | Precision | 74.3 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Graph learning | PharmGraph-Auditor (Ours, GPT-4o) | Recall | 0.8243 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Graph learning | Graph | Precision | 0.9565 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Graph learning | Overall (Micro) | Precision | 0.8491 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
Medication errors pose a significant threat to patient safety, making pharmacist verification (PV) a critical, yet heavily burdened, final safeguard.
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
Hardware requirements
No verified implementation available
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Natural language processing, Graph learning
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Natural Language Processing, Large Language Models
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.