Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies
← Back to explorer

Tag: Math

Math evaluation papers that call for domain expertise or specialist review (141 papers).

Papers in tag: 141

Need Math evaluators for your project?

Post a Job →

Research Utility Snapshot

Evaluation Modes

  • Automatic Metrics (13)

Human Feedback Types

  • Pairwise Preference (4)
  • Red Team (3)
  • Rubric Rating (3)

Required Expertise

  • Math (20)
  • Coding (5)
  • Law (3)
Are We Measuring Strategy or Phrasing? The Gap Between Surface- and Approach-Level Diversity in LLM Math Reasoning

Sangmook Lee, Minbeom Kim, Jeonghye Kim, Dohyung Kim, Sojeong Rhee, Kyomin Jung · Jun 29, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Math
  • Using a human-calibrated LLM judge framework, we show that prior diversity measures are unreliable proxies for approach-level diversity, and this mismatch carries over to diversity-aware RLVR, where target metrics are preserved while…
  • However, optimizing an LLM judge diversity reward during training causes the policy to exploit judge-specific preferences rather than broaden its approaches, leaving direct optimization of approach-level diversity as an open problem.
LatentRevise: Learning from Zero-Hit Reasoning

Yiqiu Guo, Xueting Han, Qi Jia, Guangtao Zhai, Jing Bai · Jun 29, 2026 · Citations: 0

Critique Edit Math
  • Used as training data, these trajectories improve SFT and RLVR on math benchmarks over standard baselines.
SABER-Math: Automated Benchmark for Information Retrieval Evaluation in Mathematics

Nikolay Georgiev, Maria Drencheva, Kseniia Ibragimova, Ivo Petrov, Dimitar I. Dimitrov, Martin Vechev · Jun 29, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics Math
  • As agentic AI systems tackle more complex mathematical tasks, they increasingly rely on information retrieval (IR) to search problem databases, theorem libraries, and educational resources.
  • Importantly, we show that general-purpose IR benchmarks such as MTEB do not reliably predict mathematical performance, especially for recent embedding models, highlighting the need for math-specific retrieval benchmarks.
Cliff Tokens: Identifying Single-Token Failure Triggers in LLM Mathematical Reasoning

Jaeyong Ko, Pilsung Kang, Yukyung Lee · Jun 24, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics Math
  • Across seven models and three mathematical reasoning benchmarks (GSM1K, MATH500, AIME 2025), cliff tokens act as failure triggers; deleting the first cliff token and resampling recovers pass@64 to 1.0, while keeping it limits recovery to…
  • Trained on GSM8K, Cliff-DPO improves accuracy across benchmarks by up to +6.6.
Blockwise Policy-Drift Gating for On-Policy Distillation

Liwen Zheng, Haiyun Jiang · Jun 23, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics Math
  • In a six-variant Qwen3 math reasoning benchmark with a uniform 200-step training budget for all trained variants, we use pass@8 as the primary problem-level solve-rate metric.
  • On Teacher-TopK/LSM, Block64 gives the best four-benchmark mean pass@8 among trained students.
Beyond Helpfulness: A Teaching-over-Solving Diagnostic for Measuring Educational Impact in LLM Tutors

Junyi Yao, Zihao Zheng, Baichuan Li · Jun 15, 2026 · Citations: 0

Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics Math
  • We propose a lightweight diagnostic based on the gap between solving-oriented and pedagogy-oriented benchmark performance.
  • Using public MathTutorBench leaderboard results, we show that these dimensions are only partially aligned: across eight publicly reported models, the correlation between solving and pedagogy composites is 0.421, and several models shift…
SEAL: Can Saturated Benchmarks Be Revived by LLM-as-a-Meta-Judge?

Jiamin Chen, Yidi Wu, Qiexiang Wang, Qianben Chen, Yuchen Li, Yansen Zhang · May 28, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics MathCoding
  • Therefore, we present Seeded Elimination with Adaptive LLM-as-a-Meta-Judge, a self-improving evaluation protocol for extracting latent ranking signal from saturated benchmarks.
  • We evaluate SEAL on multiple saturated benchmarks covering code generation, mathematical reasoning, knowledge-intensive question answering, and tool-use agent task completion.
Scaling Laws for Agent Harnesses via Effective Feedback Compute

Xuanliang Zhang, Dingzirui Wang, Keyan Xu, Qingfu Zhu, Wanxiang Che · May 28, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics MathLaw
  • Agent harnesses shape language-model performance by controlling tool use, feedback, verification, memory, and repair.
  • Across synthetic, real, held-out, and prospective evaluations, EFC-based coordinates outperform raw-compute baselines and SAS.
Maestro: Reinforcement Learning to Orchestrate Hierarchical Model-Skill Ensembles

Jinyang Wu, Guocheng Zhai, Ruihan Jin, Yuhao Shen, Zhengxi Lu, Fan Zhang · May 21, 2026 · Citations: 0

Expert Verification Automatic Metrics MathCoding
  • In this paper, we present Maestro (Multimodal Agent for Expert-Skill Targeted Reinforced Orchestration), a Reinforcement Learning (RL)-driven orchestration framework that reframes heterogeneous multimodal tasks as a sequential…
  • We evaluate Maestro across ten representative multimodal benchmarks spanning mathematical reasoning, chart understanding, high-resolution perception, and domain-specific analysis.
Efficient Agentic Reasoning Through Self-Regulated Simulative Planning

Mingkai Deng, Jinyu Hou, Lara Sá Neves, Varad Pimpalkhute, Taylor W. Killian, Zhengzhong Liu · May 21, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics Math
  • To test this, we develop SR^2AM (Self-Regulated Simulative Reasoning Agentic LLM), realizing both as distinct stages within an LLM's chain-of-thought, with the LLM as world model.
  • Across math, science, tabular analysis, and web information seeking, v0.1-8B and v1.0-30B achieve Pass@1 competitive with 120-355B and 685B-1T parameter systems respectively, while v1.0-30B uses 25.8-95.3% fewer reasoning tokens than…
Correct Is Not Enough: Training Reasoning Planners with Executor-Grounded Rewards

Tianyang Han, Hengyu Shi, Junjie Hu, Xu Yang, Zhiling Wang, Junhao Su · May 5, 2026 · Citations: 0

Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics MathLaw
  • Extensive experiments on code and math benchmarks show that this executor-grounded reasoning reward improves the two-stage planner-executor system over execution-only training, suggesting that reasoning supervision should evaluate not only…