Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Tag: General

General-purpose raters without strict specialist requirements.

Papers in tag: 585

Research Utility Snapshot

Evaluation Modes

  • Automatic Metrics (16)
  • Human Eval (4)
  • Simulation Env (3)

Human Feedback Types

  • Pairwise Preference (5)
  • Critique Edit (1)
  • Expert Verification (1)

Required Expertise

  • General (20)
ICON: Indirect Prompt Injection Defense for Agents based on Inference-Time Correction

Che Wang, Fuyao Zhang, Jiaming Zhang, Ziqi Zhang, Yinghui Wang, Longtao Huang · Feb 24, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics General
  • Large Language Model (LLM) agents are susceptible to Indirect Prompt Injection (IPI) attacks, where malicious instructions in retrieved content hijack the agent's execution.
  • Existing defenses typically rely on strict filtering or refusal mechanisms, which suffer from a critical limitation: over-refusal, prematurely terminating valid agentic workflows.
CAMEL: Confidence-Gated Reflection for Reward Modeling

Zirui Zhu, Hailun Xu, Yang Luo, Yong Liu, Kanchan Sarkar, Kun Xu · Feb 24, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise PreferenceCritique Edit Automatic Metrics General
  • Reward models play a fundamental role in aligning large language models with human preferences.
  • Existing methods predominantly follow two paradigms: scalar discriminative preference models, which are efficient but lack interpretability, and generative judging models, which offer richer reasoning at the cost of higher computational ove
CARE: An Explainable Computational Framework for Assessing Client-Perceived Therapeutic Alliance Using Large Language Models

Anqi Li, Chenxiao Wang, Yu Lu, Renjun Xu, Lizhi Ma, Zhenzhong Lan · Feb 24, 2026 · Citations: 0

Human EvalAutomatic Metrics General
  • Experiments show that CARE outperforms leading LLMs and substantially reduces the gap between counselor evaluations and client-perceived alliance, achieving over 70% higher Pearson correlation with client ratings.
  • CARE also produces high-quality, contextually grounded rationales, validated by both automatic and human evaluations.
Stop-Think-AutoRegress: Language Modeling with Latent Diffusion Planning

Justin Lovelace, Christian Belardi, Sofian Zalouk, Adhitya Polavaram, Srivatsa Kundurthy, Kilian Q. Weinberger · Feb 24, 2026 · Citations: 0

Llm As JudgeAutomatic Metrics General
  • Evaluations show STAR-LDM significantly outperforms similar-sized models on language understanding benchmarks and achieves $>70\%$ win rates in LLM-as-judge comparisons for narrative coherence and commonsense reasoning.
PreScience: A Benchmark for Forecasting Scientific Contributions

Anirudh Ajith, Amanpreet Singh, Jay DeYoung, Nadav Kunievsky, Austin C. Kozlowski, Oyvind Tafjord · Feb 24, 2026 · Citations: 0

Human EvalSimulation Env General
  • We introduce PreScience -- a scientific forecasting benchmark that decomposes the research process into four interdependent generative tasks: collaborator prediction, prior work selection, contribution generation, and impact prediction.
  • We develop baselines and evaluations for each task, including LACERScore, a novel LLM-based measure of contribution similarity that outperforms previous metrics and approximates inter-annotator agreement.
Contextual Safety Reasoning and Grounding for Open-World Robots

Zachary Ravichandran, David Snyder, Alexander Robey, Hamed Hassani, Vijay Kumar, George J. Pappas · Feb 23, 2026 · Citations: 0

Simulation Env General
  • Traditional safety approaches enforce fixed constraints in user-specified contexts, limiting their ability to handle the open-ended contextual variability of real-world deployment.
  • We address this gap via CORE, a safety framework that enables online contextual reasoning, grounding, and enforcement without prior knowledge of the environment (e.g., maps or safety specifications).
Anatomy of Agentic Memory: Taxonomy and Empirical Analysis of Evaluation and System Limitations

Dongming Jiang, Yi Li, Songtao Wei, Jinxin Yang, Ayushi Kishore, Alysa Zhao · Feb 22, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics General
  • Agentic memory systems enable large language model (LLM) agents to maintain state across long interactions, supporting long-horizon reasoning and personalization beyond fixed context windows.
  • Despite rapid architectural development, the empirical foundations of these systems remain fragile: existing benchmarks are often underscaled, evaluation metrics are misaligned with semantic utility, performance varies significantly across
Learning to Reason for Multi-Step Retrieval of Personal Context in Personalized Question Answering

Maryam Amirizaniani, Alireza Salemi, Hamed Zamani · Feb 22, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics General
  • Personalization in Question Answering (QA) requires answers that are both accurate and aligned with users' background, preferences, and historical context.
  • By optimizing multi-turn reasoning trajectories under a personalized reward function, the framework reinforces reasoning paths that better align with user-specific preferences and contextual signals reflected by the reward model.
Validating Political Position Predictions of Arguments

Jordan Robinson, Angus R. Williams, Katie Atkinson, Anthony G. Cohn · Feb 20, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Human Eval General
  • Real-world knowledge representation often requires capturing subjective, continuous attributes -- such as political positions -- that conflict with pairwise validation, the widely accepted gold standard for human evaluation.
  • We address this challenge through a dual-scale validation framework applied to political stance prediction in argumentative discourse, combining pointwise and pairwise human annotation.
Context-Aware Mapping of 2D Drawing Annotations to 3D CAD Features Using LLM-Assisted Reasoning for Manufacturing Automation

Muhammad Tayyab Khan, Lequn Chen, Wenhe Feng, Seung Ki Moon · Feb 20, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic MetricsSimulation Env General
  • When deterministic scoring cannot resolve an ambiguity, the system escalates to multimodal and constrained large-language-model reasoning, followed by a single human-in-the-loop (HITL) review step.
  • By prioritizing deterministic rules, clear decision tracking, and retaining unresolved cases for human review, the framework provides a practical foundation for downstream manufacturing automation in real-world industrial environments.
Simplifying Outcomes of Language Model Component Analyses with ELIA

Aaron Louis Eidt, Nils Feldhus · Feb 20, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics General
  • The effectiveness of this approach was empirically validated through a mixed-methods user study, which revealed a clear preference for interactive, explorable interfaces over simpler, static visualizations.