Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies
← Back to explorer

Tag: General

General papers in the current HFEPX explorer (897 papers).

Papers in tag: 897

Running a General study?

Post a Job →

Research Utility Snapshot

Evaluation Modes

  • Automatic Metrics (7)
  • Human Eval (4)
  • Llm As Judge (3)

Human Feedback Types

  • Pairwise Preference (11)
  • Rubric Rating (4)
  • Demonstrations (2)

Required Expertise

  • General (20)
LieCraft: A Multi-Agent Framework for Evaluating Deceptive Capabilities in Language Models

Matthew Lyle Olson, Neale Ratzlaff, Musashi Hinck, Tri Nguyen, Vasudev Lal, Joseph Campbell · Mar 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics General
  • Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit impressive general-purpose capabilities but also introduce serious safety risks, particularly the potential for deception as models acquire increased agency and human oversight diminishes.
  • In this work, we present LieCraft: a novel evaluation framework and sandbox for measuring LLM deception that addresses key limitations of prior game-based evaluations.
"Dark Triad" Model Organisms of Misalignment: Narrow Fine-Tuning Mirrors Human Antisocial Behavior

Roshni Lulla, Fiona Collins, Sanaya Parekh, Thilo Hagendorff, Jonas Kaplan · Mar 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference General
  • The alignment problem refers to concerns regarding powerful intelligences, ensuring compatibility with human preferences and values as capabilities increase.
  • Current large language models (LLMs) show misaligned behaviors, such as strategic deception, manipulation, and reward-seeking, that can arise despite safety training.
Beyond Rows to Reasoning: Agentic Retrieval for Multimodal Spreadsheet Understanding and Editing

Anmol Gulati, Sahil Sen, Waqar Sarguroh, Kevin Paul · Mar 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

Human EvalAutomatic Metrics General
  • We introduce Beyond Rows to Reasoning (BRTR), a multimodal agentic framework for spreadsheet understanding that replaces single-pass retrieval with an iterative tool-calling loop, supporting end-to-end Excel workflows from complex analysis…
  • Supported by over 200 hours of expert human evaluation, BRTR achieves state-of-the-art performance across three frontier spreadsheet understanding benchmarks, surpassing prior methods by 25 percentage points on FRTR-Bench, 7 points on…
COLD-Steer: Steering Large Language Models via In-Context One-step Learning Dynamics

Kartik Sharma, Rakshit S. Trivedi · Mar 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise PreferenceDemonstrations General
  • Experiments across a variety of steering tasks and benchmarks demonstrate that COLD-Steer achieves upto 95% steering effectiveness while using 50 times fewer samples compared to the best baseline.
  • Our framework opens new possibilities for adaptive, context-aware model control that can flexibly address varying loss-driven human preferences through principled approximation of learning dynamics rather than specialized training…
PONTE: Personalized Orchestration for Natural Language Trustworthy Explanations

Vittoria Vineis, Matteo Silvestri, Lorenzo Antonelli, Filippo Betello, Gabriele Tolomei · Mar 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Human Eval General
  • To address these challenges, we present PONTE (Personalized Orchestration for Natural language Trustworthy Explanations), a human-in-the-loop framework for adaptive and reliable XAI narratives.
  • It combines: (i) a low-dimensional preference model capturing stylistic requirements; (ii) a preference-conditioned generator grounded in structured XAI artifacts; and (iii) verification modules enforcing numerical faithfulness,…
Qworld: Question-Specific Evaluation Criteria for LLMs

Shanghua Gao, Yuchang Su, Pengwei Sui, Curtis Ginder, Marinka Zitnik · Mar 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

Rubric Rating General
  • We introduce One-Question-One-World (Qworld), a method that generates question-specific evaluation criteria using a recursive expansion tree.
  • On HealthBench, Qworld covers 89% of expert-authored criteria and generates 79% novel criteria validated by human experts.
Evaluating Austrian A-Level German Essays with Large Language Models for Automated Essay Scoring

Jonas Kubesch, Lena Huber, Clemens Havas · Mar 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

Rubric Rating Human Eval General
  • This paper investigates the application of state-of-the-art open-weight LLMs for the grading of Austrian A-level German texts, with a particular focus on rubric-based evaluation.
  • The LLMs were able to reach a maximum of 40.6% agreement with the human rater in the rubric-provided sub-dimensions, and only 32.8% of final grades matched the ones given by a human expert.
Knowledge Divergence and the Value of Debate for Scalable Oversight

Robin Young · Mar 5, 2026 · Citations: 0

Rlaif Or Synthetic Feedback General
  • AI safety via debate and reinforcement learning from AI feedback (RLAIF) are both proposed methods for scalable oversight of advanced AI systems, yet no formal framework relates them or characterizes when debate offers an advantage.
  • When models share identical training corpora, debate reduces to RLAIF-like where a single-agent method recovers the same optimum.
S5-SHB Agent: Society 5.0 enabled Multi-model Agentic Blockchain Framework for Smart Home

Janani Rangila, Akila Siriweera, Incheon Paik, Keitaro Naruse, Isuru Jayanada, Vishmika Devindi · Mar 5, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference General
  • The smart home is a key application domain within the Society 5.0 vision for a human-centered society.
  • As smart home ecosystems expand with heterogeneous IoT protocols, diverse devices, and evolving threats, autonomous systems must manage comfort, security, energy, and safety for residents.
ThaiSafetyBench: Assessing Language Model Safety in Thai Cultural Contexts

Trapoom Ukarapol, Nut Chukamphaeng, Kunat Pipatanakul, Pakhapoom Sarapat · Mar 5, 2026 · Citations: 0

Llm As JudgeAutomatic Metrics General
  • Using ThaiSafetyBench, we evaluate 24 LLMs, with GPT-4.1 and Gemini-2.5-Pro serving as LLM-as-a-judge evaluators.
  • Finally, we introduce the ThaiSafetyBench leaderboard to provide continuously updated safety evaluations and encourage community participation.
VRM: Teaching Reward Models to Understand Authentic Human Preferences

Biao Liu, Ning Xu, Junming Yang, Hao Xu, Xin Geng · Mar 5, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Human Eval General
  • Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across diverse natural language tasks, yet the reward models employed for aligning LLMs often encounter challenges of reward hacking, where the approaches predominantly rely on…
  • Motivated by this consideration, we propose VRM, i.e., Variational Reward Modeling, a novel framework that explicitly models the evaluation process of human preference judgments by incorporating both high-dimensional objective weights and…
When Weak LLMs Speak with Confidence, Preference Alignment Gets Stronger

Amirabbas Afzali, Myeongho Jeon, Maria Brbic · Mar 5, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics General
  • Building on this insight, we propose Confidence-Weighted Preference Optimization (CW-PO), a general framework that re-weights training samples by a weak LLM's confidence and can be applied across different preference optimization…
  • Notably, the model aligned by CW-PO with just 20% of human annotations outperforms the model trained with 100% of annotations under standard DPO.
TimeWarp: Evaluating Web Agents by Revisiting the Past

Md Farhan Ishmam, Kenneth Marino · Mar 5, 2026 · Citations: 0

Demonstrations General
  • The improvement of web agents on current benchmarks raises the question: Do today's agents perform just as well when the web changes?
  • We introduce TimeWarp, a benchmark that emulates the evolving web using containerized environments that vary in UI, design, and layout.
LocalSUG: Geography-Aware LLM for Query Suggestion in Local-Life Services

Jinwen Chen, Shuai Gong, Shiwen Zhang, Zheng Zhang, Yachao Zhao, Lingxiang Wang · Mar 5, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics General
  • While LLMs offer strong semantic generalization, deploying them in local-life services introduces three key challenges: lack of geographic grounding, exposure bias in preference optimization, and online inference latency.
  • Extensive offline evaluations and large-scale online A/B testing demonstrate that LocalSUG improves click-through rate (CTR) by +0.35% and reduces the low/no-result rate by 2.56%, validating its effectiveness in real-world deployment.
Alignment Backfire: Language-Dependent Reversal of Safety Interventions Across 16 Languages in LLM Multi-Agent Systems

Hiroki Fukui · Mar 5, 2026 · Citations: 0

Simulation Env General
  • We report four preregistered studies (1,584 multi-agent simulations across 16 languages and three model families) demonstrating that alignment interventions in large language models produce a structurally analogous phenomenon: surface…
  • Study 3 (N = 180) tested individuation as countermeasure; individuated agents became the primary source of both pathology and dissociation (DI = +1.120) with conformity above 84%--demonstrating iatrogenesis.
IF-RewardBench: Benchmarking Judge Models for Instruction-Following Evaluation

Bosi Wen, Yilin Niu, Cunxiang Wang, Xiaoying Ling, Ying Zhang, Pei Ke · Mar 5, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Llm As Judge General
  • Instruction-following is a foundational capability of large language models (LLMs), with its improvement hinging on scalable and accurate feedback from judge models.
  • To this end, we propose IF-RewardBench, a comprehensive meta-evaluation benchmark for instruction-following that covers diverse instruction and constraint types.
AILS-NTUA at SemEval-2026 Task 12: Graph-Based Retrieval and Reflective Prompting for Abductive Event Reasoning

Nikolas Karafyllis, Maria Lymperaiou, Giorgos Filandrianos, Athanasios Voulodimos, Giorgos Stamou · Mar 4, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics General
  • We present a winning three-stage system for SemEval 2026 Task~12: Abductive Event Reasoning that combines graph-based retrieval, LLM-driven abductive reasoning with prompt design optimized through reflective prompt evolution, and post-hoc…
  • Cross-model error analysis across 14 models (7~families) reveals three shared inductive biases: causal chain incompleteness, proximate cause preference, and salience bias, whose cross-family convergence (51\% cause-count reduction)…
Memex(RL): Scaling Long-Horizon LLM Agents via Indexed Experience Memory

Zhenting Wang, Huancheng Chen, Jiayun Wang, Wei Wei · Mar 4, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics General
  • Large language model (LLM) agents are fundamentally bottlenecked by finite context windows on long-horizon tasks.
  • The agent can then decide when to dereference an index and recover the exact past evidence needed for the current subgoal.
When Do Language Models Endorse Limitations on Human Rights Principles?

Keenan Samway, Nicole Miu Takagi, Rada Mihalcea, Bernhard Schölkopf, Ilias Chalkidis, Daniel Hershcovich · Mar 4, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise PreferenceRubric Rating General
  • As Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly mediate global information access with the potential to shape public discourse, their alignment with universal human rights principles becomes important to ensure that these rights are abided by…
  • In this paper, we evaluate how LLMs navigate trade-offs involving the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), leveraging 1,152 synthetically generated scenarios across 24 rights articles and eight languages.
Towards Natural Personalization: Evaluating Long-Horizon Preference Following in Personalized User-LLM Interactions

Qianyun Guo, Yibo Li, Yue Liu, Bryan Hooi · Mar 4, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise PreferenceRubric Rating Llm As Judge General
  • Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly serving as personal assistants, where users may share individual preferences over extended interactions.
  • However, assessing how well LLMs can follow these preferences in natural, long-term situations remains underexplored.