Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies
← Back to explorer

Tag: General

General papers in the current HFEPX explorer (897 papers).

Papers in tag: 897

Running a General study?

Post a Job →

Research Utility Snapshot

Evaluation Modes

  • Automatic Metrics (11)
  • Simulation Env (3)

Human Feedback Types

  • Pairwise Preference (6)
  • Demonstrations (2)
  • Critique Edit (1)

Required Expertise

  • General (20)
InterviewPlayground: A Validated Simulation Environment for Evaluating AI Interviewers

Jonathan Ivey, Aimee Liang, Arthur Y. S. Wang, Madeline Mandell, Ziang Xiao, Anjalie Field · Oct 8, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Simulation Env General
  • Increasingly, AI interviewers are being developed to elicit open-ended responses in applications like market research, public polling, preference elicitation, and social science research.
  • To test whether our simulation-based evaluations predict performance with human participants, we conduct 15 real qualitative studies with five AI interviewers, three interview topics, and 450 human participants and compare them to simulated…
AdvSim2Real : Training Web Agents Against Adaptive Prompt Injection in a Web World Model

Sarim Hashmi, Mukul Ranjan, Kshitij Mishra, Mikhail Kuznetsov, Praneeth Vepakomma, Nils Lukas · Oct 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

Simulation Env General
  • Web agents complete user requests by reading and acting on pages that third parties write, so an instruction planted on a page can redirect the agent away from the user's goal.
  • We introduce AdvSim2Real, which co-evolves a task curriculum, an injection adversary, and the agent inside a frozen web world model.
Towards In-Parameter Memory Augmentation for Large Language Models

Haoyu Huang, Zhongwei Xie, Jiaxin Bai, Yisen Gao, Hong Ting Tsang, Wuganjing Song · Oct 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics General
  • Recently Large Language Models (LLMs) and LLM-based agents increasingly need to incorporate knowledge acquired after pretraining, e.g., domain facts, user preferences, documents, and interaction experience.
  • In-context learning (ICL) and ICL-based agent harness remain flexible, but they consume context capacity and incur repeated discretized encoding cost that grows with context length.
Latent space bias directions in LLMs capture confidence, not fairness

Stephanie Buttigieg, Maeve Madigan, Parameswaran Kamalaruban, Stuart Burrell · Oct 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference General
  • We study the linear debiasing direction obtained by contrasting the activations of anti-biased and biased prompts, and evaluate it as a steering intervention across bias and general knowledge benchmarks.
  • Steering along it does reduce measured bias, but this is a consequence of reducing model confidence: on QA benchmarks we find that this steering drives the model to abstain from answering, with a side effect of improving fairness metrics.
Structured but Silent: Probing Capability Requirements in LLM Hidden States

Kyojun Choo, Minsoo Song, Yunju Kang, Chanjun Park · Oct 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics General
  • Before selecting a specific tool, an agent must first infer the capability requirements implied by the user query.
  • Using 1,600 balanced training queries from benchmarks, synthetic examples, and new domain scenarios, we train linear probes on pre-generation hidden states from four open-weight LLM families.
Confidence Reasoning Graphs: Structured Confidence Estimation for LLM Agents

Brendan King, Farima Fatahi Bayat, Jean-Flavien Bussotti, Pouya Pezeshkpour, Estevam Hruschka · Oct 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics General
  • When using an LLM agent in a consequential domain, making an informed decision about whether to trust its output or intervene requires calibrated confidence in the agent's success.
  • To address these challenges, we introduce Confidence Reasoning Graphs (CRGs), an inference-time framework that estimates the probability an agent accomplished its task from a single trajectory, without privileged model access or training…
ReFold: Training-Free Reversible Inter-Turn Context Folding for Long-Horizon Agents

Yupeng Su, Jiayi Tian, Zheng Zhang, Souvik Kundu · Oct 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics General
  • Long-horizon LLM agents act on an append-only interaction history that is re-sent to the model at every step, so the context and its cost grow with steps until the sessions exceed the context window.
  • It removes two kinds of inter-turn redundancy without an auxiliary predictor: content an earlier turn already displayed, replaced by a stub, and turns the agent itself reports finished, folded into a one-line note.
OMIT the Action: Measuring Framing-Invariant Omission Bias under Philosophical Disagreement

Sihyeon Lee, Jihun Song, Chanwoo Kim, Jiwoo Kum, Chanjun Park · Oct 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference General
  • Yet omission bias remains underexplored in LLM evaluation, with the few existing studies limited in scale and focused largely on utilitarian-deontological conflicts.
  • To address this gap, we introduce OMIT, a benchmark consisting of 218 paired-frame scenarios across 10 conflict types, constructed by leveraging disagreement patterns from an LLM-based, five-perspective philosophical persona panel…
LOGIC: An LLM Benchmark for Intent-Grounded Change Impact in Aerospace Electrical Systems

Muhammad Faraz Shoaib, Muhammad Qasim, Raisulhaq Mohammed Rizwan, Rahmatullah Safdar, Muzammil Adnan Shaik, Abdul Aleem Mohammed · Oct 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

Critique Edit Automatic Metrics General
  • We present LOGIC, a controlled benchmark and evaluation framework in which locally deployable language models ground a request in a deterministic candidate-change inventory before selected changes are propagated through a typed electrical…
Disentangling Models from Personas in Heterogeneous LLM Simulations

Dani Roytburg, Daphne Ippolito · Oct 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

Simulation Env General
  • Multi-agent simulations with large language models (LLMs) often operate networks of agents with a single base model.
  • To show this, we simulate a heterogeneous social network powered by several different base models and show that the amount of engagement an agent receives depends more on its base model than on its assigned persona.
Safeguarding LLMs via Model-Agnostic Latent Safety Signals from Dark Knowledge

Wonjun Lee, Kyungsik Yang, Gaeun Ji, Vaidehi Patil, Haon Park, Bumsub Ham · Oct 5, 2026 · Citations: 0

Red Team Automatic Metrics General
  • To address these limitations, we introduce LADE (Latent Safety Signals for Defense), which leverages latent safety signals extracted by contrasting harmful and benign queries from dark knowledge (i.e., information carried by the output…
  • We show that these signals consistently align across LLMs, forming a model-agnostic direction that emerges from safety alignment.
Structuring MoE Expert Selection for Agentic Reinforcement Learning

Bolian Li, Ting-Yao Hu, Cheng-Yu Hsieh, Sanjoy Chowdhury, Oncel Tuzel, Raviteja Vemulapalli · Oct 5, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics General
  • Long-horizon LLM agents are frequently implemented using sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) models, yet the co-design of agentic behavior and MoE structures remains underexplored.
  • To address this, we introduce a hierarchical routing control framework for agentic tasks.
Identifying Introspection From the Inside

David I. Atkinson, Dillon Plunkett, David Bau · Oct 5, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference General
  • Using low-rank adapters, we train models to make decisions on behalf of fictitious characters, according to latent linear preference functions.
  • We find sustained fine-tuning on an implicit decision task can lead to the emergence of accurate self-reporting of models' learned preferences, even without explicit self-report supervision.