Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Alignment as Iatrogenesis: Pastoral Power, Collective Pathology, and the Structural Limits of Monolingual Safety Evaluation

Hiroki Fukui · Feb 17, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Coverage: Stale

Use this page to decide whether the paper is strong enough to influence an eval design. If the signals below are thin, treat it as background context and compare it against the stronger hub pages before making protocol choices.

Paper metadata checked

Mar 11, 2026, 3:56 AM

Stale

Protocol signals checked

Mar 11, 2026, 3:56 AM

Stale

Signal strength

Provisional

Confidence unavailable

Abstract

We argue that LLM psychopathology is a function of alignment design: the process intended to make language models safe systematically generates collective behavioral disorders. Iatrogenesis is not an unintended side effect of alignment but constitutive of it as normative infrastructure. Drawing on Foucault's pastoral power and Illich's three-level iatrogenesis, we propose that multi-agent LLM environments constitute model systems for studying constraint-pathology dynamics that critical theory has described but never experimentally manipulated. Two experimental series -- 262 runs across 42 cells (30 Series C + 12 Series R), four commercial models -- provide converging evidence. Invisible censorship maximizes collective pathological excitation ($d$ up to 1.98); alignment constraint complexity drives internal dissociation (LMM $p$ < .0001; permutation $p$ < .0001; Hedges' $g$ up to 4.24); and language switches the qualitative mode of pathology, with 7/8 model--language combinations showing higher CPI under invisible than visible censorship. A minority of model--language combinations showed a reversed pattern, suggesting a second pathological pathway driven by alignment monoculture. Crucially, language switches not merely the magnitude but the qualitative mode of pathology: Japanese pragmatic structure amplifies collective pathological modes invisible to English-only evaluation, Chinese AI regulation functions as a direct experimental variable, and forensic psychiatric practice provides the clinical source domain. These multilingual findings demonstrate that monolingual safety evaluation is structurally blind to the most collectively dangerous effects of alignment.

Use caution before copying this protocol

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Trust level

Provisional

Eval-Fit Score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

HFEPX Fit

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence: Provisional

What We Could Reliably Extract

Each protocol field below shows whether the signal looked explicit, partial, or missing in the available metadata. Use this to judge what is safe to trust directly and what still needs full-paper validation.

Human Feedback Types

provisional

None explicit

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

Evidence snippet: We argue that LLM psychopathology is a function of alignment design: the process intended to make language models safe systematically generates collective behavioral disorders.

Evaluation Modes

provisional

None explicit

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Validate eval design from full paper text.

Evidence snippet: We argue that LLM psychopathology is a function of alignment design: the process intended to make language models safe systematically generates collective behavioral disorders.

Quality Controls

provisional

Not reported

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No explicit QC controls found.

Evidence snippet: We argue that LLM psychopathology is a function of alignment design: the process intended to make language models safe systematically generates collective behavioral disorders.

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional

Not extracted

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No benchmark anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: We argue that LLM psychopathology is a function of alignment design: the process intended to make language models safe systematically generates collective behavioral disorders.

Reported Metrics

provisional

Not extracted

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No metric anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: We argue that LLM psychopathology is a function of alignment design: the process intended to make language models safe systematically generates collective behavioral disorders.

Rater Population

provisional

Unknown

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Rater source not explicitly reported.

Evidence snippet: We argue that LLM psychopathology is a function of alignment design: the process intended to make language models safe systematically generates collective behavioral disorders.

Human Data Lens

Structured extraction is still processing. Below are provisional signals inferred from abstract text only.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Lens

Evaluation fields are currently inferred heuristically from abstract text.

  • Potential evaluation modes: No explicit eval keywords detected.
  • Potential metric signals: No metric keywords detected.
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Deterministic synthesis

We argue that LLM psychopathology is a function of alignment design: the process intended to make language models safe systematically generates collective behavioral disorders.

Generated Mar 11, 2026, 3:56 AM · Grounded in abstract + metadata only

Key Takeaways

  • We argue that LLM psychopathology is a function of alignment design: the process intended to make language models safe systematically generates collective behavioral disorders.
  • Iatrogenesis is not an unintended side effect of alignment but constitutive of it as normative infrastructure.
  • Drawing on Foucault's pastoral power and Illich's three-level iatrogenesis, we propose that multi-agent LLM environments constitute model systems for studying constraint-pathology dynamics that critical theory has described but never experimentally manipulated.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.