Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

HFEPX · Eval paper review

DAEDALUS: Bootstrapping Agent Memory from Self-Generated Tasks

Antoine Edy, Max Conti, Victor Xing, Marc-Antoine Allard +2 more

Published

Oct 6, 2026

Citations

0

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

5/100 (Low)

Extraction confidence

45% (Low)

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Rater population

Not reported

Signals refreshed

Oct 6, 2026

Should you rely on this paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A benchmark-and-metrics comparison anchor.

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Human feedback signal
Not explicit
Not explicit in abstract metadata
Evaluation signal
Detected
Eval setup described
Usefulness for eval research
5/100
Adjacent candidate

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Abstract

LLM agents often lack the operational knowledge to act reliably in new environments, as they must discover specific tool behaviors or environment conventions on their own. Without memory of past attempts, they repeat the same mistakes across tasks, leading to more task failures and longer trajectories. To address this, agentic systems typically rely on human-written guidelines or on procedural memory built from training tasks and an oracle verifier, both of which require prior knowledge of the environment. We present DAEDALUS, a method for bootstrapping reusable agent memory from self-generated practice without existing tasks or oracle verifiers. DAEDALUS pairs two agents: an explorer that interacts with the environment to generate challenging yet solvable tasks, and a solver that attempts them. A heuristic is derived from each solver failure and accepted only after the solver repeatedly succeeds with that heuristic in context. These outcomes also provide feedback for the explorer to refine the difficulty of future tasks. Accepted heuristics are then consolidated into a memory bank for test-time use. Across AppWorld, $τ^2$-bench, and AutomationBench, DAEDALUS improves mean success rates by up to 15.9 points and pass^5 by up to 2.2x over a no-memory baseline, and is competitive with methods using training tasks, at a lower inference cost than most. We show that performance gains already emerge with a small exploration budget, and that its heuristics also benefit agents from other model families. Our ablations further reveal that solver traces provide the key information needed to derive effective heuristics, while factorizing early discoveries makes exploration more cost-efficient. Beyond memory construction, we find that the tasks generated by DAEDALUS can serve as a proxy for benchmark tasks when ranking models by performance. Code and artifacts: www.github.com/illuin-tech/daedalus.

What we could verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"LLM agents often lack the operational knowledge to act reliably in new environments, as they must discover specific tool behaviors or environment conventions on their own."

Evaluation Modes

partial

Automatic Metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"LLM agents often lack the operational knowledge to act reliably in new environments, as they must discover specific tool behaviors or environment conventions on their own."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"LLM agents often lack the operational knowledge to act reliably in new environments, as they must discover specific tool behaviors or environment conventions on their own."

Benchmarks / Datasets

partial

Automationbench

Useful for quick benchmark comparison.

"Across AppWorld, $τ^2$-bench, and AutomationBench, DAEDALUS improves mean success rates by up to 15.9 points and pass^5 by up to 2.2x over a no-memory baseline, and is competitive with methods using training tasks, at a lower inference cost than most."

Reported Metrics

partial

Inference cost

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"Across AppWorld, $τ^2$-bench, and AutomationBench, DAEDALUS improves mean success rates by up to 15.9 points and pass^5 by up to 2.2x over a no-memory baseline, and is competitive with methods using training tasks, at a lower inference cost than most."

Benchmarks and datasets

Automationbench

Reported metrics

inference cost
Human feedback details
Uses human feedback
No
Feedback types
None
Rater population
Not reported
Unit of annotation
Ranking (inferred)
Expertise required
Coding
Evaluation details
Evaluation modes
Automatic Metrics
Agentic eval
None
Quality controls
Not reported
Evidence quality
Low
Use this page as
Background context only

Research brief

Metadata summary

LLM agents often lack the operational knowledge to act reliably in new environments, as they must discover specific tool behaviors or environment conventions on their own.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key takeaways

  • LLM agents often lack the operational knowledge to act reliably in new environments, as they must discover specific tool behaviors or environment conventions on their own.
  • Without memory of past attempts, they repeat the same mistakes across tasks, leading to more task failures and longer trajectories.
  • To address this, agentic systems typically rely on human-written guidelines or on procedural memory built from training tasks and an oracle verifier, both of which require prior knowledge of the environment.

Researcher actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Simulation environment) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended queries

Contribution summary

  • LLM agents often lack the operational knowledge to act reliably in new environments, as they must discover specific tool behaviors or environment conventions on their own.
  • We present DAEDALUS, a method for bootstrapping reusable agent memory from self-generated practice without existing tasks or oracle verifiers.
  • We show that performance gains already emerge with a small exploration budget, and that its heuristics also benefit agents from other model families.

Why it matters for eval

  • We present DAEDALUS, a method for bootstrapping reusable agent memory from self-generated practice without existing tasks or oracle verifiers.
  • We show that performance gains already emerge with a small exploration budget, and that its heuristics also benefit agents from other model families.

Researcher checklist

  • Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Automatic Metrics

  • Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    Detected: Automationbench

  • Metric reporting is present

    Detected: inference cost